Posted on 09/19/2015 9:58:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I agree! I was delighted how he dismissed the Globull Warming liberal question,and went on to the next question.
No more playing nice nice giving deference to a rogue president who is trashing the Constitution, and putting American lives at risk!
“Methinks thou doth protest too much!” It’s true.
Trump defend Obama? ‘I don’t think so!’: “Am I morally obligated to defend the president”?
Sorry, Democrats. That’s Jeb’s job.
No Christian could have uttered those words. Obama is a Muslim, without question. He accepts the validity of the Koran as having been divinely revealed.
Trump should have stated, “How do I defend the honor of a person who has none?”
Here is what I posted on the thread about the media poseurs, Chris Matthews & Bill Maher, claiming to have nailed Trump, a little while ago:
"Yes, to be very clear. Donald Trump handled the questions that have Chris & Bill so excited, precisely in the most statesman like manner It was a splendid moment for Trump, if one fully understands the context.
"But before going into that, let me make it very clear. I am not anti-Muslim. I do not favor large scale immigration from the Near East, for the same reason that I do not favor large scale immigration from most places. We do not need new settlers; we do not need cultural diversity. But that is not directed against Islam. Yet none of that has really anything material to do with the subject of what happened at the Town Meeting.
"Trump's approach was not bigoted; not in the slightest. The article shows who was bigoted, and it is those "politically correct" crack-pots, who believe other people have a duty to stifle any thought with which those "politically correct" crackpots do not agree. (The defined category includes Hillary Clinton, and quite a few confused babblers, of which Matthews & Maher are perhaps among the grossest examples.)
"Stifling free expression is not the duty of a candidate; it is not the moral duty of anyone. It is, to be sure, the essence of the "politically correct" crackpot! And Donald has already, clearly distanced himself from the "politically correct" crackpots. In that, he is truly a breath of fresh air.
"Now Islam is not the issue, in dealing with this thread. Obama's upbringing, and ideological orientation, and the bases for all of that, are continuing issues, whether Matthews & Maher want to gobble something otherwise or not. And many Americans are not convinced that Obama was actually born here. Just who are Matthews & Maher to say that no one should be permitted to inquire into such subjects?
"William Flax"
Hard to defend the indefensible. Obama is either Muslim or Satan.
Maybe she needs the next size up in boobs or a shorter skirt so we can see the camel. Not pretty getting older is Megyn?
So the liberal media is saying there is something wrong with being called a Muslim? Hmmm, quite a few million Muslims might disagree.
Botox? Silicone?
Trump worries me but this is exactly the correct answer.
“Could it be that by reacting this way, they are showing their own unstated bias against Muslims?”
I think it is because they don’t want the American people to get wise to Obama. If that were to happen, their whole corrupt edifice (democrat party, media, etc.) would fall like a house of cards.
If Obama’s word and actions themselves haven’t served convince the questioner from White Plains that he is 1) not a Muslim and 2) an American (and they obviously haven’t), what hope does Trump have of convincing him?
Kelly has proven herself to be a bought and paid for $2 dollar whore; I don’t even watch her program any more except when I forget to change the channel or am out of the house.
The intent, as you point out, is to "beg the question". The intent is to distract from the facts, well known to every U.S. senator, all of them but John McCain having signed Senate Resolution 511, April 2008, “Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.” the resolution sponsored not by Republicans but by Obama's campaign co-chair Claire McCaskill.
Resolutions are talking points and carry no force of law. Testimony invited by the sponsors of the resolution (all of whom are Democrats protecting McCain) by former federal judge and DHS Chairman Michael Chertoff included:
Chertoff: “My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” “That is mine, too,” said Leahy.”
SR511 was hurriedly submitted when Obama and McCaskill's first effort to cover McCain's well known eligibility problems. It was Senate Bill 2678, February 2008, co-sponsored by Obama and McCaskill, called the "Foreign Born Children of Military Parents Natural Born Citizen Act." It failed to pass.
McCain's problems were well publicized by the New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, dozens of law school professors who submitted essays to legal journals, and to half a dozen Congressmen who submitted Constitutional amendments to Article II Section 1 that would have made Obama and McCain, along with Schwarzenegger (by Orin Hatch) eligible.
It is doubtful that anyone in Congress doesn't know that our CIA Director, John Brennan, is a Wahhabi Muslim, converted when he was Chief of Station in Riyadh in the 1990s. Only a few with public exposure have spoken openly about Brennan. A former Mother Jones journalist was about to publish an expose but conveniently died as his car exploded in Los Angeles, videos confirming that the BMW's engine was ejected before the care collided with a tree.
Admiral James Lyons, Commander of the Pacific Fleet is harder to silence, and has the sources, having created the espionage branch of the Navy Seals. The senior FBI specialist on Jihad, John Guandolo, a decorated Marine officer and Naval Academy graduate before joining the FBI, was removed during purge a of anyone knowledgeable about Islam. The purge removed the word "Islamic Terrorism" and many like it from the lexicon permitted to government employees. Guandolo exposed the Brennan conversion, related to him by other CIA converts. (Fans of "Homeland" will perhaps recall the scene in which a meeting at CIA headquarters is delayed while an officer completes one of his prayer sessions.) Guandolo had written the FBI training manuals on Islamic Terrorism, thrown out at the behest of CAIR and ISNA officials in a letter to John Brennan.
Given that Sharia Law controverts our Constitution Brennan should not have been confirmed. But to date, being a Muslim violates no law, though any Muslim swearing sole allegiance to our Constitution is committing apostasy, or, more likely, lying to promote Islam, ordained by the Quran, Taqiyya.
Having been born to an alien father is illegal if you occupy the presidential office. There is no law preventing an ineligible candidate from running. One candidate in 2008 was not even a citizen and the two major candidates naturalized, and thus not natural born citizens. At least Obama was legally honest about his having been naturalized by the 14th Amendment. McCain kept his head down and said nothing about his status, protected by the same media, WaPo, NYT, Chicago Trib, which had, until the Summer of 2008, published competent legal analysis of McCain's insufficiency, exemplified by Arizona Professor Gabriel Chin's thorough analysis.
There are very legitimate issues regarding Muslims in government, but the media and government have so thoroughly concealed those issues that the questions posed to Trump can be nothing other than chatter intended to keep real questions buried. We have officials like James Clapper and, yes, George Bush, who call Islam a religion of peace while Prime Minister Edogan of Turkey and Hilary's friend (Hilary boasted of killing him after he had become our ally) Kaddafi, and Osama bin-Laden are more honest and tell us that Islam is Islam." "There is no such thing as "radical Islam."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.