Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norquist Blesses Trump's Tax Plan, Brings 'Jobs, Jobs, Jobs'
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 9/28/15

Posted on 09/28/2015 10:00:05 AM PDT by Helicondelta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: dp0622

It is based on my impression of markets and that I trade every day and the last few weeks just do not feel right. Today was really really weird from a liquidity standpoint.

All major markets around world down 20-40%.

This census information also very telling.

http://www.silverdoctors.com/census-data-proves-it-there-was-no-economic-recovery-unless-you-were-already-rich/

Yellen will never ever ever raise rates. Something very wrong.

Half the container fleet in China is in dry dock which means bad business for China and no one buying in America.

I could go on and on plus I have some colleagues who have been in these markets for 60 years and they are telling me same.


41 posted on 09/28/2015 12:01:53 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kazan; demshateGod
...So because Grover is "pro-Muslim" that means Trump is? What idiotic contention.

Hey, go easy on her, about all they have left is idiotic contention.

42 posted on 09/28/2015 12:05:53 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

The technical look weak. Support breaking down everywhere. Moving averages being violated.

Dont kow if we’ll go as low as last time, but you’re right. The never ending QE is a bad sign.

this president is a disaster.


43 posted on 09/28/2015 12:09:57 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

It is a feeling I get.

6 months ago trading was much much different.

Today was a disaster. Liquidity was really thin.

Options were very erratic like the market makers had no idea how to price them.

Right now until end of year I am shorting only. Nothing else.


44 posted on 09/28/2015 12:15:24 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

I’ll admit up front that I should read through Trump’s tax plan (on his website) a couple time more. But... I don’t see much there regarding income determination, especially as regarding small businesses. Income determination is where a LOT of the current “complexity” problems reside, for those receiving other than a simple paycheck (or checks), a pension, SS, etc.

I suppose the operative term for me, here, is “lukewarm”, but I do like the idea(s) to stimulate business activity.

I’d prefer something along the lines of an end-user sales tax, myself, but Trump’s plan would not set me against him, at least not as I presently understand his plan.


45 posted on 09/28/2015 12:17:26 PM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Dont know what to do about the 401Ks for me and fiance. I wanted to switch to safety after 18,000 kept failing. But I guess those are for long term. Doesn’t mean I want to lose alot!!

I’m big on tech and I see this market being very weak if it breaks below 16000. There’ll be nothing to stop it until testing support at high 14000s. After that...


46 posted on 09/28/2015 12:21:16 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
I don't like Grover Norquist either, but he's endorsing Trump's tax plan, not his immigration policy or his foreign policy.

People don't seem to get the concept that an individual can be wrong on many if not most issues but still be right on some others. If a conservative candidate received an endorsement from an anti-abortion Catholic Bishop who is a welfare state liberal or an open borders enthusiast, would it make sense to reject that endorsement?

47 posted on 09/28/2015 12:22:20 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Yes.

NOW, abolish minimum wage, federal protection of unions and the tonnage of useless and wasteful and costly dead-end regulations, and we’ll be on our way.

You won’t have to worry about “fair” trade and tariffs because with those things in place, the market economy will be free to roll like a juggernaut.

Next: CUT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - BY A LOT!!!


48 posted on 09/28/2015 12:28:42 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

I understand you point.

Let me put my point another way:

We need someone to read Norquist out of the Conservative movement like Buckley did to the LaRouchites.

We can’t be having bedfellows who literally now or figuratively later (via Sharia) want to chop our heads off.

Conservatism needs Norquist GONE, or Norquist needs to clearly, consistently and loudly reject islamism. I have not heard that from him. If Norquist’s first and last words are not “while I am a muslim I disagree with all political islam”, then I don’t want to hear ANYTHING from another literal or figurative head chopper.


49 posted on 09/28/2015 12:29:08 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Imagine the GOPe spending half as much energy attacking liberals as they do conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
If the Dow keeps dropping, we may not have to worry about Capital Gains, only losses. The 10th largest company in the world, Glencore just lost 30%.

Housing also had a bad number today, and will get even worse as the market implodes, which I believe it will.

50 posted on 09/28/2015 12:31:32 PM PDT by montag813 (Bring Back Tar and Feathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Norquist doesn't pretend to speak for "the conservative movement," whatever his other views on other issues may be, he's pretty much a single-issue lobbyist. He endorses or rejects candidates based almost solely on whether they accept or reject his no-tax pledge. A lot of voters and organizations are single-issue voters or lobbyists, which makes for odd bedfellows on other issues.

We need someone to read Norquist out of the Conservative movement like Buckley did to the LaRouchites.

I don't think I'd care for anyone who has a presumption to speak for who does or doesn't belong in the conservative movement, because "conservatism" means different things to different people. I dislike Norquist, but I equally strongly dislike much of the GOP establishment and the neoconservatives. Do I get to drum them out? If not, who does? The bottom line is that I can decide for myself whose views I agree or disagree with, I don't need an official spokesman like Buckley to tell me who is out and who is in.

51 posted on 09/28/2015 12:47:21 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

Fair enough.

Have a great day!


52 posted on 09/28/2015 12:52:15 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Imagine the GOPe spending half as much energy attacking liberals as they do conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kazan; demshateGod; SeekAndFind; Uncle Miltie; All

That is not the impression I got from reading Comment #5. More, it seems like Norquist is trying to get on his good side and the poster was calling attention to his various connections with Islamic/Arab causes, which include his Palestinian wife. There are those who feel that Norquist has single handedly done more damage to our military with his NO NEW TAXES pledge that has been done by Al Qaida, ISIL and other terrorist groups.


53 posted on 09/28/2015 2:02:00 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

“There are those who feel that Norquist has single handedly done more damage to our military with his NO NEW TAXES pledge that has been done by Al Qaida, ISIL and other terrorist groups.”

Wow. That’s not conservatism.

As we know, tax cuts increase revenues to the Treasury because more people are more motivated to work. Less welfare outflow, more taxable economic activity. This has been proved every time it is tried.

So only an uninformed right winger or a leftist would suggest tax cuts are bad for the military.


54 posted on 09/28/2015 2:11:22 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Imagine the GOPe spending half as much energy attacking liberals as they do conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie; gleeaikin

“No new taxes” forces the congress to cut spending elsewhere to get more funds to the military. And there is plenty of waste to cut, starting with Obamacare and working backwards from there. If they could simply raise taxes, there would be no impetus to cut. And without a strong motivation, nothing will ever be cut.


55 posted on 09/28/2015 2:15:54 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Donald...don’t go anywhere near Norquist.
Those who do usually end like Marco Rubio.
Cast onto the rubbish heap of corrupted politicians.


56 posted on 09/28/2015 2:34:19 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Great link ‘Tank. And to think the National Rifle Association allowed this POS Norquist to serve as a Board Member for a LONG time when they damn well KNEW all along of his continuing anti-American activities. Nice huh?


57 posted on 09/28/2015 5:03:41 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie; All

I guess I’m just prejudiced because I have had a son in 82nd Airborne and Special Forces who has served in Gulf War 1 and two tours in Afghanistan, who is still serving. And now my grandson has enlisted.


58 posted on 09/28/2015 11:21:24 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I happened to walk by TV today, and there’s our president addressing the UN and talking about the number one threat in this world.

CLIMATE CHANGE


59 posted on 09/29/2015 1:17:09 AM PDT by nikos1121 ("There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bobby.223

I tore up my NRA membership a few years ago when they endorsed all the Democrat incumbents in NM.

... I wrote them a letter, as well.


60 posted on 09/29/2015 7:39:29 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson