Posted on 09/30/2015 9:12:20 AM PDT by tcrlaf
and Mission Accomplished.
” We made clear we would have grave concerns if Russia struck areas where there was no Isis presence.”
So? Under previous president’s that may have carried weight but under this sniveling, mouthy fagot it’s just bluff and bluster with as much possibility of consequence as a steer has of siring a calf.
Forgive me, but my memory needs refreshing.
Was there an ISIS when Bush left office?
Was it Bush who actually negotiated the embarrassing nuclear deal with Iran?
Was it really Bush who threatened a "red line" in Syria, then failed to follow-through?
And Bush must've been the President who abandoned Israel, right?
Bush set the table by getting rid of Saddam, who while a bad guy, kept the Iranians in check.
As I recall, the Iranians were still "in check" when Bush left office.
Mmmmmmmm, let's see...the sanctions were still in place...the regime was still subject to internal stress...they weren't free to acquire ICBMs...they didn't have a clear path to developing a nuclear weapon...they still had to anticipate the threat of military action -- by either Israel or America...et cetera, et cetera.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.