Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Op-Ed: Five Supreme Court cases to watch that could make history
LATimes ^ | October 4, 2015

Posted on 10/04/2015 5:32:27 AM PDT by SMGFan

Last year the Supreme Court decided several momentous cases involving some of America's most contentious topics, including same-sex marriage and Obamacare. The new term, which begins Monday, is also full of controversial cases that could help shape the emerging identity of the Roberts court and affect the direction of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Despite the recent horrible decision we should be glad Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others have not retired. I have wondered why, but I was glad. But of course a vacancy next Summer would be filled by BHO. Senate GOP would not stop it unless Mitch McC were off of leadership. not happening.
1 posted on 10/04/2015 5:32:27 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Ya mean............

..............which way will “Justice” Kennedy lean—Don’cha??


2 posted on 10/04/2015 5:37:53 AM PDT by Flintlock (Our soapbox is gone, the ballot box stolen--we're left with the bullet box now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The Supreme Court is now the grammar-checking, law-rewriting, propaganda-reviewing arm of the Progressive wing of the Democrat party.

IMHO


3 posted on 10/04/2015 5:39:04 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

If the past is any indication, the decisions will SUCK.


4 posted on 10/04/2015 5:43:17 AM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Abortion, birth control, race top Supreme Court’s agenda

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_NEW_TERM?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-10-03-09-20-34


5 posted on 10/04/2015 5:48:48 AM PDT by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is now on twitter @SarahMGellar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Abortion & Obamacare weren’t mentioned in the LA Times piece (unless I missed it)


6 posted on 10/04/2015 5:55:48 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

These Justices need to be periodically reviewed for suitability. The story states that one of the cases involves the death penalty, which it claims Breyer looks prepared to rule to be unconstitutional - even as the 5th Amendment implicitly permits it.


7 posted on 10/04/2015 5:59:01 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Amendment X
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

Prohibition had to be enacted through Amendment, because it was once believed that Congress, thanks to the above, did not have the power to legislate such matters for the States.

Now, however, we have a Court (or a majority of five justices) who usurp the power of both Congress and the States, to legalize abortion, probably outlaw the death penalty. legalize gay marriage, etc. etc.

All hail the new oligarchs.

(But where do they get the authorization to do any of this?)


8 posted on 10/04/2015 6:03:44 AM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Exactly. The Supreme Court has lost all credibility. We will need to change the constitution to fix it, otherwise the states need to just immediately nullify whatever they say.


9 posted on 10/04/2015 6:07:19 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Time to get some of this crap reversed.


10 posted on 10/04/2015 6:11:12 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

bmp4L8R


11 posted on 10/04/2015 6:14:37 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The Anti-Federalists warned us of the flaw in the Constitution that federal judges could progressively, slowly, one baby step at a time gather power unto themselves until they would become uncontrolled law makers.


12 posted on 10/04/2015 6:23:40 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella; SMGFan

The Ant-Federalist Papers are more prophetic than the Federalist Papers, for sure:

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/anti-federalist-papers


13 posted on 10/04/2015 6:27:22 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Ronald Reagan’s Kennedy will again keep the liberal ship afloat. All that needs to be said


14 posted on 10/04/2015 6:43:45 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley

Yup! The country is being run by 9 unelected judges.


15 posted on 10/04/2015 6:44:16 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

The “high court” has full credibility with the American people who consistently vote for candidates consistent with the liberal judges.


16 posted on 10/04/2015 6:44:42 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fella

Don’t blame the Framers. We’ve had 225 years to correct original errors.

It is why an Article V state convention to propose amendments should be an annual event.


17 posted on 10/04/2015 6:50:01 AM PDT by Jacquerie ( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Could someone give a synopsis so those of us with limited internet resources can avoid the LA times clickbait?


18 posted on 10/04/2015 6:51:43 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Ping to #17.


19 posted on 10/04/2015 6:56:15 AM PDT by Jacquerie ( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

I think it is about time for the States to declare the opinions of the SCOTUS null and void in said state and they will not be enforced. Why not? Many are clearly unconstitutional and the Department of Injustice picks and chooses which laws to enforce. Do we have a Governor out there with any balls?


20 posted on 10/04/2015 6:57:50 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson