Posted on 10/05/2015 12:54:49 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Try this headline in The Politico: "Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary." Now, stop and think about that: "Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary -- How non-citizens decrease Republican chances of winning the White House next year." That's published with absolutely no concern for the fact that we are talking about noncitizens, people here illegally voting. In fact, it's written as though it's just a standard, ordinary, everyday facet of our elections and campaigns, that on Election Day, illegal immigrants are going to vote.
"Noncitizens." It's the word in the subhead.
"Illegal immigrants -- along with other noncitizens without the right to vote -- may pick the 2016 presidential winner. Thanks to the unique math undergirding the Electoral College, the mere presence of 11-12 million illegal immigrants and other noncitizens here legally may enable them to swing the election from Republicans to Democrats." See how easy this is? You simply add these people, these Democrat voters. You assume that some of them are going to vote (you don't have a problem with that) and, bammo! Democrats win! Do you know what this story does?
And, actually, to tell you the truth, this story is an anti-Electoral College story.
That's the real focus.
Well, maybe not the real focus. There may be a hidden subtext of the story, because it's aimed at creating distrust and anger for the Electoral College, and using illegal immigrants to do so. But what this story does, whether advertently or inadvertently, is illustrate once and for all what the real purpose of amnesty is. It's a Democrat voter-registration drive. As far as the Democrats are concerned and their friends and accomplices in the media, that's the only thing it is. It's not compassion. It's not about that. It's not people coming here to improve their lives from their war-torn, poverty stricken homelands. It's purely about electing Democrats.
Make no bones about it, here, that that's the express purpose, almost the exclusive reason for supporting it.
I think any illegal who tries to vote in a U.S. election without the benefit of citizenship ought to be kneecapped by the nearest big ol’ bubba.
It could come to this. . .
If Mexicans tended to vote Republican, there would already be a wall from Tijuana, CA to Brownsville, TX one hundred feet tall and fifty feet thick.
But their is no vote fraud. Voter ID is racist.
The Same reason the Elites in Europe are Allowing this invasion of migrants from the 3rd world in their countries.
No Skilled Labor Dependent on the State to provide, they are the providers, so they will be voted for and elected.
The don’t have to vote to effect the outcome because their numbers in California affect the number of electoral votes and house members, whether they ever vote or not.
This goes in the “Gee! Who didn’t see this coming, since 0bie’s last summer’s invasion?” file.
RUSH: Try this headline in The Politico: “Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary.” Now, stop and think about that: “Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary — How non-citizens decrease Republican chances of winning the White House next year.” That’s published with absolutely no concern for the fact that we are talking about noncitizens, people here illegally voting.
Which, however, is not at all what the article is about. The article discusses the fact that the number of electoral votes is based on population, including illegals.
Ask yourself WHY, during his recent trip to Kenya, obozo pledged over 50 million bucks to that corrupt government for A VOTER ID PROGRAM as his Just Us department has blown well over that amount trying to PREVENT STATES FROM REQUIRING PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP HERE??
That is what they plan to do.
We don’t need a wall to keep illegal aliens out. We need to prosecute those who employ, enable, and harbor illegal aliens for treason and then execute them. Do this maybe a few hundred times and there will be no reason for anyone to try to colonize our country.
Limbaugh should have read the article - he didn’t do his homework.
The article explicitly assumes that non-citizens will not vote.
The plan was for the illegals to be legalized via DACA, then DAPA in a number of several million, then place them strategically in critical districts of battleground states.
The plan was not to have them vote illegally so much as it was to have them vote legally after obtaining citizenship. What was needed was to coordinate with the new Mexican President Nieto to fabricate papers that supported claims that the DACA/DAPA registrants had been in the USA for at least 5 years enabling them for immediate citizenship. Obama met with Nieto late last year for this precise purpose.
We have already witnessed how the DACA registrants were moved all around the country and we have seen that many of these ‘children’ are in fact grown men,
Yes...and, who’s to know, with the days he has remaining in office, what 0 will do towards that end.
However, see post #7, as how this might not even matter...that just having the sheer numbers may work to their advantage, especially in states like CA and TX.
Yes #7 affirms why one of Obama’s first acts in 2009 was to take over the Census Bureau using Rahm Emanuel.
I also witnessed in 1990 in California how illegal and Latino households were ‘coached’ to inflate the numbers of people living in their households. So if there were 7 illegals living in a 3 bedroom house, they would simply tell the Census Taker there were 15, etc.
Good point. The mere presence of the illegals supercharges the electoral votes of California, New York, Illinois, and other big States with large numbers of illegal aliens.
Texas tilts the other way, but the Democrats have Texas in their crosshairs despite the fact that they have failed miserably in Texas since Texans got a good look at Slick and his Beastwoman in the 90's.
Those who think this piece is about illegals voting, READ THE ARTICLE! It is about the Electoral Collage.
Interesting link, with good Electoral Votes info and 2010 Census numbers/additions, past polling, by each state/overall, etc...
http://www.270towin.com/states/
Shows which way state is leaning, for 2016, as well as historical data. Thought you might find it interesting.
Something I found interesting is that TX faired the best, after 2010 Census...with a gain of 4, for 38 total.
CA actually gained 0.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.