Skip to comments.
Congressman demands climate study documents as scientists warn of ‘chilling effect’
Washington Post ^
| November 6, 2015
| Lisa Rein
Posted on 11/06/2015 1:04:28 PM PST by detective
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
NOAA issues climate change "studies" based on fraudulent data. NOAA "studies" are paid for with taxpayer dollars yet they refuse to provide any of the backup or support behind the so called "studies". Congress expressed "serious concernsâ about the role that NOAA officials, including the agency's political appointees, may have had âin the decision to adjust the temperature data and widely publicize conclusions based on those adjustments."
When Congress asks to see the backup and supporting documents NOAA throws a hissy fit.
They called it "intimidation" and said it "imposes a chilling effect" on NOAA employees.
1
posted on
11/06/2015 1:04:28 PM PST
by
detective
To: detective
NOAA can keep it all confidential, but Exxon is supposed to divulge all to New York??
2
posted on
11/06/2015 1:05:55 PM PST
by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: detective
They need some time to delete emails.
To: detective
“that could thwart federally funded research.”
Good.
5.56mm
4
posted on
11/06/2015 1:08:11 PM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: detective
What’s the point of releasing a pile of Blank Paper ?
To: M Kehoe
Lol.
6
posted on
11/06/2015 1:13:35 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: detective
As Rush stated the other day, “Why are liberals upset when it turns out that the earth isn’t getting warmer?” Of course we all know the answer.
To: detective
The chilling effect and intimidation happened this week when NewYork announced it is investigating ConocoPhillips for not rubber stamping the government’’s fraudulent climate change data. All gas and oil pipelines to NY should be cut off this winter so these extortionists would not need to worry about warming.
8
posted on
11/06/2015 1:14:03 PM PST
by
txrefugee
To: detective
The hard drives are crashing even as we speak.
9
posted on
11/06/2015 1:15:44 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: detective
FU NOAA, you work for US and Congress has oversight powers, granted by the Constutition, to check and balance your administrative jobs.
STUFF IT CLIMATE CHANGE LIARS!
10
posted on
11/06/2015 1:17:02 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(To hell with the Republican Party. I'm done with them. If I want a Lib Dem I'd vote for one.)
To: detective
Good-chill the NOAA employees and cut off all their money until they cough up all the documents asked for-then ask for more documents...
11
posted on
11/06/2015 1:17:46 PM PST
by
Texan5
("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
To: txrefugee
I’d do it if I were the supplier. Works for Putin in Europe! lol
12
posted on
11/06/2015 1:18:06 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(To hell with the Republican Party. I'm done with them. If I want a Lib Dem I'd vote for one.)
To: detective
All Federal funding has to be appropriated by Congress. They seem to think they are entitled to it. This is the problem with running the government through continuing resolutions and stimulus bills and quantitative easing. Congress loses the power over the purse strings.
13
posted on
11/06/2015 1:19:22 PM PST
by
webheart
(We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
To: detective
There will be no accountability for anything with the current justice department and their Liar in Chief, Obama. And... if we have another Dem administration then we will have totally lost our national sovereignty.
To: Lake Living
15
posted on
11/06/2015 1:29:09 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: detective
Fiscal year 2015 discretionary budget request for NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, totals $5.5 billion. This is $174 million over the 2014 enacted budget, an increase of 3.2 percent.
To: detective
If the conclusions reached by federally funded research are fiction, then I am 100% in favor of said research being thwarted.
What are they afraid of, anyway? If they cannot defend their research methodology and/or their conclusions, then they are unworthy of the title “scientist”.
17
posted on
11/06/2015 1:32:23 PM PST
by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: detective
If they’re honest, what’ve they got to hide?
18
posted on
11/06/2015 1:33:44 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: detective
When are these punks going to go away?
Just asking.
IMHO
19
posted on
11/06/2015 1:35:03 PM PST
by
ripley
To: detective
You mean like the chilling effect when Global Warming skeptics are labeled knuckle dragging, anti-science “deniers” and demonized?
20
posted on
11/06/2015 1:40:09 PM PST
by
rbg81
(is pr)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson