Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our President Doesn't Know That a "Religious Test" for Refugees Seeking Asylum
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | November 18, 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/18/2015 2:42:21 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
The rest of the title is Is Required by Federal Law
1 posted on 11/18/2015 2:42:21 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“From 1924 to 1965 we didn’t have any immigration.”

That can’t be true. There all sorts of emigres who came here during that period fleeing this or that.


2 posted on 11/18/2015 2:44:28 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Of course Obama has a religious test for refugees. How else can one explain the fact he wants tens of thousands of Muslims to come here, but his administration has only let in 53 Syrian Christians. And the Christians are the ones being beheaded and crucified.


3 posted on 11/18/2015 2:46:22 PM PST by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

We had very very little.


4 posted on 11/18/2015 2:46:48 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

A bunch of artists and scientists came here fleeing the Bolsheviks and Nazis. Nabokov, Rachmaninov, Thomas Mann...


5 posted on 11/18/2015 2:57:10 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Borges
My great Grandfather became a citizen in 1925 or so but he got here in 1912, signed his letter of intent around 1917. He had to swear (To God) that he wasn't an anarchist, a polygamist or a believer in the practice of polygamy. The polygamy question seems to suggest a religious question.



It also happens to be at the time of the greatest influx of Middle Eastern Christians. (until about a century ago the Christian population of the middle east was about 40%)
6 posted on 11/18/2015 3:03:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Rush must be coming to FreeRepublic for show.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3361401/posts

I cited that exact section and made the same point yesterday. Keep coming here, Rush, you'll see a lot of good stuff on this forum.

7 posted on 11/18/2015 3:06:19 PM PST by Armando Guerra (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bookmarked.


8 posted on 11/18/2015 3:12:51 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From 1924 to 1965 we didn’t have any immigration.

I've heard Rush say that two or three times and he's incorrect. Immigration was low during those years compared to now, but the US did average around 200,000 per year.

Can't find a table of historical immigration by year to US now, but have in the past.

9 posted on 11/18/2015 3:16:30 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Rush is missing some years.

My grandparents came to the States in the 50’s. They fled from Europe on a ship. They had to have sponsors in order to enter the USA and my mom had received a scholarship to a Catholic College otherwise she wouldn’t have been allowed in.

How times have changed.


10 posted on 11/18/2015 3:21:08 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger

I’ve read that he’s turning away some Christians because they don’t fit his definition of persecuted, because he doesn’t want to include religion in the definition.


11 posted on 11/18/2015 3:22:10 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That is cool, thanks for sharing.


12 posted on 11/18/2015 3:23:55 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From 1924 to 1965 we didn't have any immigration.

I love Rush, but he's simply wrong.

My father, his parents, and his aunt's family of four came here from Berlin in 1938,39.

ML/NJ

13 posted on 11/18/2015 3:25:24 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

I don’t know much, but they did turn down a lot of Jews before the holocaust.


14 posted on 11/18/2015 3:26:03 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

We had the Cuban refugees but that was not a huge amount of people.


15 posted on 11/18/2015 3:30:41 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From 1924 to 1965 we didn’t have any immigration.

Here is a graph of legal immigration to the US from 1820 to 2013. It looks like the average between the 1920s and 1965 ranged from a few tens of thousands some years to 200,000 plus some years. But still far below the numbers of recent decades. So, Rush is wrong on this. One of the .03% times he's wrong, I guess.

Go to link below, then click on: Legal Immigration to the United States, 1820-2013

Graph: Legal Immigration to the United States, 1820-Present

16 posted on 11/18/2015 3:37:58 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
I don’t know much, but they did turn down a lot of Jews before the holocaust.

There was the famous case of the SS St. Louis that was turned away, but I don't if a lot were turned away, or if very many were even able to make to the US to ask for entry.

17 posted on 11/18/2015 3:40:27 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

SHARE THIS 31/2 MINUTE VIDEO WITH THOSE STILL CONFUSED ABOUT ISLAM:
http://www.israelvideonetwork.com/the-video-moderate-muslims-didnt-want-to-get-out/


18 posted on 11/18/2015 3:42:14 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges; All
” ”From 1924 to 1965 we didn’t have any immigration.”

That can’t be true. There all sorts of emigres who came here during that period fleeing this or that. "

And there are possibly more problems with Mr. Limbaughs statement then he knows.

I am sorry to say that these days patriots need to check every action of the corrupt federal government against its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. And in the case of so-called federal immigration laws, the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration imo.

More specifically, regardless of PC interpretations of the Constitutions ”uniform Rule of Naturalization” Clause (1.8.4) used to justify federal immigration laws, and the slavery-related clause (1.9.1), Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, Madison generally regarded as the father of the Constitution, had clarified, in the context of state sovereignty nonetheless, that the Founding States had not delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration.

Here is the relevant excerpt from Jeffersons writings.

” 4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that ”the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the - day of July, 1798, intituled ”An Act concerning aliens,” which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force [emphasis added].” Thomas Jefferson, Draft of the Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798.

Here is the related excerpt from Madison's writings from the Virginia Resolutions.

"That the General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the ”Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power no where delegated to the federal government, ...

. . .

. . . the General Assembly doth solemenly appeal to the like dispositions of the other states, in confidence that they will concur with this commonwealth in declaring, as it does hereby declare, that the acts aforesaid, are unconstitutional; and that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each, for co-operating with this state, in maintaining the Authorities, Rights, and Liberties, referred to the States respectively, or to the people [emphasis added]. ” James Madison, Draft of the Virginia Resolutions - December 1798.


19 posted on 11/18/2015 3:48:56 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

It is not entirely true at all:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Origins_Formula

History is awesome. But not all of it is worth repeating.


20 posted on 11/18/2015 3:59:21 PM PST by mad puppy (E PLURIBUS UNUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson