Posted on 11/27/2015 1:47:13 AM PST by mbrfl
Reciprocal....
Yours, on the other hand, "disingenuous." Puling about style is laughable.
Trump prefaced his impersonal of Kovaleski with:
“Now the poor guy.. you ought to see the guy”
You really don’t detect a prior knowledge on Trump’s part about Kovaleski’s condition?
Remember when Obama said
“And it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations,” Obama said.
I was very offended but no one seemed to care.
And remember
Liberal Website Mercilessly Mocks Down Syndrome-Suffering Trig Palin On His Birthday
Like he has any room to be calling other people names? How juvenile. Shows who and what he really is!
I love the two ladies called ‘We be sisters’ Silk and Diamond on youtube. They are stumping for Trump. On the other side, Hume is BUSHWHACKING for Bush! Just like he bushwhacked for McCain and Romney. I have had it with FOX News. There is a FOX in our Conservative hen house....
Those that put disabled people in a special class, beyond criticism or ridicule, are actually the ones who are disrespectful. Their condescension treats them as if they were helpless children that need protection. I'm pretty sure that most disabled people can handle themselves quite well and resent being tagged as victims that need constant cuddling and protection.
If we are ever going to progress as a society, we need to stop walking on eggshells and dispense with this political correctness. Those in the "protected classes" who are always looking to be the victim need to man up and stop being so perpetually offended all the time. By they way, I mean "man up" in a gender neutral way as it applies to females as well.
Grow a thicker skin you all. Life is tough and it's even tougher on those who allow themselves to be manipulated by others.
Trump prefaced his impersonal of Kovaleski with:
“Now the poor guy.. you ought to see the guyâ€
You really don’t detect a prior knowledge on Trump’s part
about Kovaleski’s condition?
Trump prefaced his impersonal of Kovaleski with:
“Now the poor guy.. you ought to see the guyâ€
You really don’t detect a prior knowledge on Trump’s part about Kovaleski’s condition?
Trump prefaced his impersonal of Kovaleski with:
“Now the poor guy.. you ought to see the guyâ€
You really don’t detect a prior knowledge on Trump’s part about Kovaleski’s condition?
____________________________________________________________
Trump has never met Kovaleski or had knowledge his disability. For your argument to hold water, Trump would have had seen this reporter making the statement that he doesn’t remember 9/11 cheering by Muslims in NJ.
“Trump doesn’t give a rat’s ass about what the media say, only that it starts with, “Today, Donald Trump...””
By Jove, I think you’re right!
And his ability to get the desired consequence without spending money is what we need in Washington!
If anyone is interested, here is a video of the reporter in question from 2013...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN_xYRgOm94
“What’s gotten into Brit Hummus?”
********************************
BushWhack Fever. He’s showing all the signs. HA!
““Having a conversation†about what to do with illegals here after the border is secured is weasel words for amnesty. “
Exactly!
I’m going with the candidate who is not vague about what he’d do with the illegals here. Cruz’s policy, released months after everyone else’s, is still vague. Purposely so, for someone so gifted with words.
“Trump has never met Kovaleski or had knowledge his disability.”
So his prior comment, “Now the poor guy.. you ought to see the guy” doesn’t stir any idea that he knew of his condition.
Got it. Thanks
— I just watched the video, and even if Trump isnt mocking the reporter, what was he doing? He looks like an idiot. —
Trump was doing what he has done in at least a dozen speeches I have watched prior to the speech in question.
I have seen it with my own eyes. Haven’t you seen it in the speeches of his you have watched?
He ALWAYS does the spastic schtick with the droopy, dopey face, to ridicule the political and media elite.
Trump critics really ought to start familiarizing themselves with Trump before they jump on the leftist bandwagon.
I have to say that I think it is obvious that he was mocking the guy’s disability, but I think that it is just part of his assault on political correctness. I think that Trump is trying to demonstrate that people who object to making fun of people with disabilities are just being too sensitive.
None of this will hurt Trump. People are fed up with lying media.
Yeah Britt,you can fool some of the people all of the time,they voted for Obama twice.
I am From Bridgeport Ct. Birth place of P.T.Barnum of Circus fame and he describes journalists like you Hume and the current crop of American voters very well,Theres one born every minute! SUCKERS!
“(In the same vein as Trump, can I insert a “Jew†joke here...because I am just being funny.)”
You’re on FR - making fun of liberals, especially liberal reporters, is considered funny.
Your trying to make it seem racist doesn’t work.
— He looks like an idiot. —
YES! You are exactly right. He looks like an idiot because he is playacting an idiot, as he ALWAYS does in every speech I have watched. It is funny.
And the idiot he is always playacting is an idiot politician or an idiot media guy.
Trump hatred really needs to move beyond hoping and wishing the worst were true.
Brit Hume is simply not credible. It is obvious he is locked into hurting Trump and meanwhile Hillary is skating with criminal enterprise. Amazing.
***I know whom I believe and it’s not Trump***
Brit Hume
The reporter renounced his own story about muslim celebrations on CNN and Hume believes him? Hume does not remember reports about muslim celebrations? I do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.