Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crystal Sugar CEO blasts anti-GMO movement, Texas Sen. Cruz
SunHerald ^ | 12/3/15 | D. Kolpack

Posted on 12/03/2015 3:28:02 PM PST by VinL

The head of the nation's largest sugar beet cooperative said Thursday that shareholders will see improved results this year, but two of his group's biggest challenges are the anti-genetically modified foods movement and Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz.

American Crystal Sugar Co. CEO David Berg received the only round of applause during his speech to the group's annual meeting when he challenged Cruz to a debate over the Republican presidential candidate's call to do away with government support for the sugar industry.

"We will defend the sugar program for a long, long time," Berg said, pretending he was addressing the Texas senator. "Hopefully longer than your presidential race will last."

Berg said at a news conference afterward that if Cruz and other politicians against the sugar program get their way, it will put American sugar companies out of business in favor of exports from Brazil, where he said growers receive $2 billion from their government to grow sugar cane.

"Sen. Cruz says he doesn't like crony capitalism, but how does he feel about subsidized socialism?" Berg asked. "Because that is what is going to happen."

Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman for the Cruz campaign, did not respond to an email seeking comment. Her cellphone wasn't accepting voicemail.

Read more here: http://www.sunherald.com/news/business/article47774695.html#storylink=cpy


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; brazil; catherinefrazier; cruz; davidberg; election2016; gmo; sugarbeet; tedcruz; tedcruzhatesfarmers; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Thibodeaux
"wouldn’t eliminating cost ineffective sugar beets be a boon for texas cane sugar?"

No idea, but that's not a concern for politicians it's a concern for sugar producers. If sugar cane is a better crop then let the market decide that.

21 posted on 12/03/2015 3:57:30 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I had to go to my other computer, your photo just appears as a little box on this one.

I’m not good on posting images. Though in some ways not flattering, I like this one— perhaps put it in your arsenal.

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21587208-if-only-ted-cruz-were-fearless-truth-teller-he-claims-be-cruz-missile


22 posted on 12/03/2015 3:59:55 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VinL; All
Noting that I will vote for Cruz if Republican nominee, please consider the following.

”. . . when he challenged Cruz to a debate over the Republican presidential candidate's call to do away with government support for the sugar industry.”

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument

GMO controversies aside, it remains that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for agricultural purposes. This is evidenced by the following excerpts from case opinions written by a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices.

So why doesn’t Harvard Law School-indoctrinated Sen. Cruz argue this point? It seems that the law schools are not emphasizing anything about the federal governments constitutionally limited powers before FDRs state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices trampled 10th Amendment-protected state sovereignty.

23 posted on 12/03/2015 4:01:35 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I've flown over the Fanjul’s sugar cane operation in Belle Glade and seen massive piles of sugar rotting away in the Florida sun. I guess when Uncle Sugar is paying you, you can afford to do that.
24 posted on 12/03/2015 4:04:10 PM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

One advantage with sugar beets is the much wider range where they can be grown vs cane sugar. They grow sugar beets in northern Michigan while cane sugar requires semi tropical climates.


25 posted on 12/03/2015 4:08:38 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Corporate pigs at the welfare trough.


26 posted on 12/03/2015 4:14:56 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (islam is a totalitarian death cult founded by a child rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter
We're geographically challenged as far as sugar cane production is concerned.



Country Wise Production and Distribution of Sugarcane around the World
27 posted on 12/03/2015 4:25:49 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VinL
"We will defend the sugar program for a long, long time," Berg said, pretending he was addressing the Texas senator. "Hopefully longer than your presidential race will last."

In other news: American Crystal CEO Berg to step down in 2016

Short war.

28 posted on 12/03/2015 4:28:20 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

I live in Pointe Coupee Parish where there are 10s of thousands of acres in sugar cane. I agree with Cruz. I say that it is a stupid crop and should no longer be subsidized.


29 posted on 12/03/2015 4:32:34 PM PST by HChampagne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Americans pay more for sugar than anyone else on the planet but Venezuelans. Good to know Cruz opposes this crony capitalism.


30 posted on 12/03/2015 8:05:32 PM PST by zeugma (http://xkcd.com/1608/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL
One of the effects of the comparatively higher cost of sugar in the US has been to drive candy manufacturers to Canada, where they can get their sugar more cheaply. So far no one seems to have thought of putting a tariff on the sugar content of imported candy.
31 posted on 12/04/2015 3:54:21 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson