[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Covered what? The guns? The pipe bombs? So they would be victims like those at the San Bernardino Christmas party?

Your analogy is so pitifully ridiculous. Anyway, it was NATO that was viewed as the thread. NATO is the gun. The country can be the woman (since you seem to insist). A woman with a big gun is just as big a threat as a man with a big gun. A woman with no gun standing right next to someone with a big gun is a big threat. Hello?

So if Mexico and Canada form a military pact with Russia and China and, say, North Korea and let them build bases along our border, you think we should do nothing? Or how about just little old Puerto Rico. How about the Russia/China/North Korea military pact gobble up Puerto Rico. What would we do?

[1rudeboy]

The louder that a pro-Putin poster screams that an analogy is ridiculous, you know it's right on the money.

So, let's use your Mexico example. Mexico decides that its citizens (who may or may not have declared independence) in S. California are being "oppressed." How would you feel about Mexico invading and annexing a portion of S. California?