Pelosi: Iranians May Do Bad Things With The $150 Billion They Got Out Of The Nuke Deal [VIDEO]

Daily Caller ^ | 1/13/16 | Steve Guest

[Libloather]

Nancy Pelosi acknowledges the Iranians may do bad things with the $150 billion dollars set to be returned to the regime as part of the Iranian nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama Administration.

Appearing on CNN's "New Day" on Wednesday, Pelosi even said the Iranians "have been doing bad things with the money that they have but the fact is the biggest threat to all of us is that Iran would have a nuclear weapon."

[Eleutheria5]

Knock me over with a feather. Nancy acknowledged that?

[AnalogReigns]

[Disestablishmentarian]

In the immortal words of General Buck Turgidson, “I smell a big fat commie rat.”

How much of the $150B might have gone to Obama? Kerrey? Hillary?

$15 billion (10%) would be a typical Finder’s Fee. Well worth it-—and would explain behavior on both sides, including Iran’s mocking the U.S. even in the last few weeks.

[Nextrush]

The foreign policy of the USA has been bipartisan since WW 2 and oriented towards making the world safe to do business in under UN rules, international law etc. etc.

Wars have been limited policing actions like Korea and Vietnam and more recently Iraq and Afghanistan.

Little wars without end because victory is not the objective, containment and eventual negotiations and peace agreements etc. are the end game.

Islamic State is also a containment thing as well.

Iran is being contained in Syria and Yemen in the civil wars there even as the friendly nuke deal is signed.

40 years ago Henry Kissinger and Gerald Ford cut deals like the Helsinki Accord to appease the Soviets even as they were helping South African troops fight Cubans in the Angolan Civil War. The Reps. in the WH and Dems in Congress.

40 years later same deal with Iran with a Dem. President and a Rep. Congress.

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>The foreign policy of the USA has been bipartisan since WW 2 and oriented towards making the world safe to do business in under UN rules, international law etc. etc.<<

---

I agree about the globalist foreign policy; but, my point is that there is so much $$$$ changing hands here, and the policy is so outrageous, that I am suspicious about outright bribes. Just look at the Clintons—the money they have taken in trading on their political positions. And Kerrey appears to have married for money twice. Can there be any doubt Obama intends to cash in? It’s the socialist way of making money—to trade political favors.

On the other hand, I do think that Obama and others in our government represent globalist forces that want to destroy Western Judaeo-Christian-Capitalist Civilization. I think Islamism, socialism, global warmism, open borders and political correctness are WMD of these forces.