You've spent hundreds of words trying to prove an irrelevant point. Not only is it mind-numbingly boring and meaningless, it's wrong.
I was responding to the statement "Funny how the Spineless Elites, who never attacked Obama, have no problem fighting Trump."
The poster never said anything about their criticism being confined ONLY to before he was elected.
It would also be incorrect, since there were at least two cover stories attacking the Obamas in 2008, including one written by Rich Lowry, the EDITOR of the magazine:
Plus, you would have to ignore the numerous 2008 writings of those in the anti-Trump article.
But I needed to make no such distinction since there was no qualifier of criticism before he was elected in the original comment.
Why you've wasted so much time trying to make such a dumb (and incorrect) argument, will show to any impartial observer that the foolish, childish, panty wetting, incogent ramblings are only coming from you.
