Posted on 01/27/2016 9:45:16 AM PST by Mariner
Fox news & MK deserve everything they get. They are acting like snob Liberals and Trump is taking them to the woodshed.
Wow.
A VERY scientific poll, too! Just look at the methodology!
/ sarc
I hate “fair and balanced.” To me it’s “dumb and dumber.” TELL THE TRUTH. Don’t “balance” the truth with a lie.
So far Trump and Bernie are coming out as the adults on their political sides.
Agree!
Maybe not scientific, but probably an indicator.....
That’s why he’s playing hardball. The media hasn’t gone after any candidate on either side like they have trump. Screw Fox
Greta certainly has way more upstairs, but MK does better in the “eye candy” category. I’d like to think that I’m more impressed with brains, but I’ll sadly admit that many of my gender are governed by hormones.
Absolutely true.
It was selected down to people who watch Fox, and specifically Greta's show.
It's likely close to the right percentage for those who watch Fox overall.
Rupert Murdock is thinking about the potential business impact and it is not unlikely that Rupert is looking beyond the $600k per minute the night of the debate.
He is asking himself if Kelly, Hume and Ailes are ruining his core business.
Girls who sleep their way to the top. See themselves as all powerful and will never withdraw.
Google Megyn Kendall and Brit Hume. Caught it when they moved a very competent Greta out of her place and inserted miss ME gin
Down 83% from what number?
Oh. Yeah. The drop in ratings will be te story. Behind the scenes, at least. As soon as megyn got snippy with the Donald I thought, oh, missy, WRONG target, you will be sorry you’re messing around
Maybe Cruz can use his world’s bestest ever ground game to get everyone to put their TVs on when he is knocking on doors.
Yet FOX is ready to damage its claim for “fair and balanced” and take a huge financial loss. Who did write the press release that even MSNBC is ridiculing?
We haven’t watched any of these phony dog and pony shows. The debates ought to be limited to more than three. The Democrats have shown that limiting it to three isfinewithis fine with the media, so the GOP does not have to provide fat ad revenue to the networks that use the debates as opportunities to destroy Republican candidates with Democrat gotcha questions.
figure what? 18 million dollars
I shouldn’t & I’m sure I’ll regret it, but I’ll give you that.
Sometimes, I would like to know that the figures are as accurate as possible- with no room for doubt due to freeping. I want THEM to know.
Of course, they will when viewership fails.
Why haven’t we been lobbying their advertisers yet?
Yup, I'll be watching with popcorn.
It might be more substantive without the blubber-blabber from "The Great Self-Contradictor."
At least we won't have to hear what great government health care Canada and Scotland have and other embarassingly ignorant nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.