Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JSDude1
I like all the plans better than what we have, as to the Cruz plan a lot to like, but this paragraph from the article for me needs explanation:

Third, because the Cruz and Paul plans are "border adjustable": Imports are taxed at the flat rate when they are brought into the U.S., but American products sold abroad are not taxed at all.

What is the manner by which imports would be taxed? As an example, wouldn't a Toyota's price increase by the amount of the corporate rate? And nearly everything purchased at Walmart? I'm ok with taxing imports and reducing taxes on exports, clearly more domestic jobs there, can someone explain this a bit further?

10 posted on 02/06/2016 3:20:17 AM PST by wayoverontheright (A falling camel attracts many knives.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wayoverontheright

“No tax exemptions for anyone.”.....

Does “anyone” include all the politicians?


12 posted on 02/06/2016 3:51:52 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright

If a tax is border adjustable, it means two main things...that taxes on goods manufactured domestically have no tax costs in them at export and that imported goods will have our federal tax added to it.

Our US income tax is not border adjustable (WTO rules) but most other countries that export to us do have border adjustable taxes (Japan, China come to mind but I’m not an expert).

The results are predictable; the US market is a gold mine...sell your stuff in the US and pay no tax on the item. So Toyota for example has a lot more room in profit to play with than Ford. In that example, Toyota is making “double” (not double in quantity but you get my meaning) profits...

So to your question, if we had a border adjusted tax system, Toyota would have to absorb tax costs on the cars they sell here. That will either make their cars price higher to absorb the tax costs or they decrease profits to absorb the tax costs or more likely there will be some combination of both.

In any case the good far outweighs the bad IMO.


26 posted on 02/06/2016 9:08:54 AM PST by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson