Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept. declares 261 new Clinton emails classified
Washington Examiner ^ | 2/29/2016 | Sarah Westwood

Posted on 02/29/2016 4:47:51 PM PST by Nachum

State Department officials declared 261 of Hillary Clinton's private emails classified Monday when the agency released the final batch of the former secretary of state's records.

The batch included 1,723 emails, totaling more than 3,800 pages. Its release marked the end of a months-long process of reviewing and redacting Clinton's private emails for release at the end of each month, a process that began last summer with a judge's ruling in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Jason Leopold of Vice News.

The State Department has now classified more than 2,000 emails, including 22 that were deemed "top secret" in January.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails; supertuesdayeve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: central_va

I’ve got a side job increasing the use of bathroom paper supplies. “:^)


21 posted on 02/29/2016 5:27:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GizzyGirl

We may not have to imagine for very long. The FBI has reportedly recovered most of the deleted emails.


22 posted on 02/29/2016 5:28:42 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

I posted this on another thread a few weeks ago:

I know I’m in the minority here at FR, but Hillary will be indicted, and here’s why.

We know how much the Clintons hate Obama for “stealing” the WH from Hillary eight years ago. We know how much Obama (Jarret) hates the Clintons for their treatment of him during the campaign and because HE wants control of the party after he leaves office.

This fight has been going on for 8 years. Obama knows that if Hillary is elected, he is out, and the Clintons are back in at the top of the party.

Low and behold, Clinton scumbag Eric Holder is out, and NY AG Lynch comes in with a reputation for prosecuting corruption cases.

Everyone seems to think that the Obama admin is leaking info to needle Hillary, but more likely it is Clinton people on the inside leaking (like they did during the Star investigation) to create the “Vast-Right-Wing-Conspiracy” smokescreen because they see the FBI, Intelligence community and Lynch putting together a rock-solid case against Hill, Bill, and maybe even Web’s daughter.

Obama gets control of the party, the ability to hand-pick his successor, a legacy of “Ethical Administration” (cough, cough) for prosecuting a top Dem, and Lynch gets the big white scalp(s) she’s always wanted.

I think they need to spring the trap just before the convention, after she has enough delegates, so they can “broker” in the nominee (Biden or the White Squaw) they want. They create last-minute momentum and avoid in-depth nominee exposure.


23 posted on 02/29/2016 5:29:06 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

-——He thinks that the game is over——

I would prefer to believe Bloomberg was told to be ready ASAP after the super Tuesday primaries for the announcement ot criminal referrals of Cheryl Mills and Huma Abudein

Squeeze the little fish until they scream in horror


24 posted on 02/29/2016 5:30:22 PM PST by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

If it was you or me we would be sitting at home with an ankle bracelet hoping the judge said five to ten if not life. This case will tell if the US is something other than a late Roman Empire meltdown.


25 posted on 02/29/2016 5:32:03 PM PST by nomorelurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

I respectfully disagree about her knowing she did anything wrong. If you want to give her the benefit of the doubt the best I would say is that in the beginning she felt it was only a rules violation And being a good “I’m doing the Lord’s work” liberal it was perfectly legitimate to lie and cheat those evil people who wanted the truth. At some point early on she knew she was in deep. And now without a loving press and a corrupt Justice Department she absolutely knows she would be both eliminated as a candidate and indicted.


26 posted on 02/29/2016 5:33:15 PM PST by freefdny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

State Department officials declared 261 of Hillary Clinton’s private emails classified Monday. But, what was the lead story on the alphabet networks tonight? —Donald Trump does not disavow David Duke (after he already disavowed him several times.) It’s pretty bad for a guy like Trump when he has to run against the press, Hillary and his own party.


27 posted on 02/29/2016 5:35:22 PM PST by shortstop (Why is the worst Pope of my lifetime serving at the same time as the worst president of my lifetime?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freefdny

Yeah - I’ll go with that: she clearly acts as if she’s entitled to be above the law because her needs and wants are superior to the law.


28 posted on 02/29/2016 5:37:17 PM PST by alancarp (There are not enough laxatives in the world to cure that what ails Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GizzyGirl

She deleted them..not erased them. Big difference. The FBI has her hard drive. There still in there


29 posted on 02/29/2016 5:40:03 PM PST by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
TigersEye, is this true?? I have never heard that... I pray for America that you are correct!!!
30 posted on 02/29/2016 5:52:10 PM PST by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
Ok, I truly thought it was “wiped clean”. Formatted, and every backup within the reverent time frame was gone. Hillary used a cloth I think?? No seriously, I last and have always thought that we would never get anything except for what she approved, and all other gone! And that's why they now need her staff's messages as well??
31 posted on 02/29/2016 6:02:25 PM PST by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GizzyGirl

Oh, yes. Gennifer Griffin said many weeks ago that her sources in the FBI told her that and she reiterated it tonight on Greta’s show. She has very good sources.

She also noted that one of the emails that could not be made public in the latest State Dept. release was because it was flagged by law enforcement.


32 posted on 02/29/2016 6:02:52 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
I think they need to spring the trap just before the convention, after she has enough delegates...

I happen to share your sense that Hillary will be indicted -- so that Zero (VJ) can retain control of the Democrat party.

Aside from an indictment, though, a presidential pardon is a necessary part of the game. To insure her cooperation, Obama promises a pardon to Hill (and Bill) -- to be issued in January, before any trial can be scheduled. Moreover, in the interest of a Mutually Assured Destruction, there is agreement that all involved will keep their mouths SHUT!

33 posted on 02/29/2016 6:03:08 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I think that Hillary will be indicted.

She had some kind of money-making operation going on in Libya and sucked Obama into Libya to cover it up.

She’s toast.


34 posted on 02/29/2016 6:28:50 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

C’mon. 0bama’s quid pro quo. He was in on it. “What’s in it for me?”


35 posted on 02/29/2016 6:31:09 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The pardon deal sounds right to me, JugEars probably told Slick he can throw in a few million from the Clinton Foundation as well when Willy got all pissed off on the golf course.


36 posted on 02/29/2016 6:31:24 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GizzyGirl

You almost have to destroy the hard drive to erase the emails. The FBI has got them. So sad for Hillary


37 posted on 02/29/2016 6:55:51 PM PST by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alancarp; GizzyGirl
"Can you even imagine what was deleted????"

In all honesty, I bet that she deleted many of the emails involving issues she was probably having with Obama...

I think it is more likely that many of the deleted ones were incriminating with regard to selling State Dept policy influence/changes for Clinton Foundation contributions. That was the main reason the private server approach was chosen in the first place, to shield that stuff from FOIA. Note that several weeks after the FBI got the server and likely started recovering deleted emails, it was leaked that the investigation had broadened to include Clinton Foundation aspects.

Hillary seems obsessed with gathering large sums of money, as has been well reported. Remember that a 39-year long string of Clinton staffers, operatives, troopers, fixers, advisers, Arkancide thugs, coroners, savings and loan staff, harassment and rape victims, etcetera, etcetera have to be kept quiet for as long as possible and that requires a lot of money. I would bet that a lot of the money the foundation spends on numerous consultants trickles down to these folks to keep them under control.

38 posted on 02/29/2016 7:03:47 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

39 posted on 02/29/2016 8:21:12 PM PST by seawolf101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SFConservative

Excellent point.


40 posted on 03/01/2016 6:54:42 AM PST by alancarp (There are not enough laxatives in the world to cure that what ails Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson