So your defense here is that you are ignorant of the facts, and that anyone who isn't must be a party to the subject at hand? There's a winning strategy. If you aren't ignorant (like you), you're a shill.
So anyone who knew the facts of the Treyvon Martin case must have been a cop? Anyone who knows about Hillary Clinton's email lies must work in the State Dept.? Anyone who can explain the FBI vs Apple case works for one or the other?
Quite frankly, I can't imagine anyone who would be a more desirable opponent for a free-trade advocate to have than you are. You make even the good arguments for tariffs seem stupid...
Have noticed he has gone dark?
Really, go for it dude. List the "stupid" reasons.