Posted on 03/25/2016 8:10:42 AM PDT by Biggirl
Hey mylife how goes in the Republic of Texas?
Amen to that.
I understand what you are saying, but the evidence of the truth of another story is not evidence of the truth of this story.
I need stronger connections in light of Trump’s friendship with CEO Pecker of the National Enquirer, the denial by Katrina Pierson, and Ted Cruz.
Maybe another Gawker verdict is in the offing.
I am content to wait and see before passing judgment.
Duh, control over a PAC is illegal, so the communication is clandestine or circumvented, or second third handed. If there was evidence of Cruz control over the PAC he'd be in big legal trouble. So what do those in DC do, they find an alternate route. Ted is not the Messiah.
So if the Donald was doing it, its great, but if Ted did he aint wise and going up to heaven?
Same here. I’m listening to Laura Ingraham.
You're unlikely to ever see the evidence. A PAC and a campaign can coordinate what the PAC does with a two minute conversation between a rep from each in an airport corridor.
But I'm skeptical that a campaign would tolerate a PAC running ads and making statements without some approval, because a PAC supposedly for a candidate could damage the candidate. I think people just have to go on instinct as to whether they believe there is coordination.
When you are absolutely positive that it's true, and absolutely sure that ppl actually care, then you may discuss on any day except Good Friday, Easter or Christmas.
Blessed Easter
You too my good friend.
Windy and warm
[Rush can’t defeat her, so he laughs instead.]
Sounds like he’s using one of Alinsky rules...ridicule.
That was nasty, even for Rush. They’re desperate. Their “conservative” saviour is blowing up in smoke. Fake. Fraud. Liar.
.@FoxNews blaming @RogerJStoneJr for spreadiing #CruzSexScandal on behalf of Trump.
One problem - he NEVER MENTIONS IT in his feed!— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) March 25, 2016
Both the Washington Times & Breitbart were aware of this. Just heard Cruz’s usual smarmy denial. And ludicrously blaming Trump for it.
What you say is true. It would cause someone to hide the evidence.
But like the prosecution of Hillary, there needs to be a showing of that evidence.
I know in politics, people draw inferences and don’t wait for the evidence like in a court of law. But people’s lives are at stake here, and I think that if we are going to spread potentially slanderous statements about anyone, public figure or not, we need to treat everyone as though it was a family member.
I don’t think Cruz controlled that PAC, because look at the shit storm it has brought down upon him. I also don’t think Trump put National Enquirer up to it either.
But either could be true.
We need to allow cooler heads to prevail.
This hurts us all.
Thanks
Sorry, I can’t understand your post. Can you rephrase it?
A few members of the media have been alluding to this for a few months. It’s not going to be swept under the rug now.
Yes, I am very disappointed in Rush. Extremely disingenuous and dishonest with his proclaimed objectivity and neutrality.
Before him our radio station give us 3 more hours of non-stop Glenn Beck sobbing for please vote for Cruz to save the world; no Christian can vote for Trump! boo boo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.