Ted Cruz Cheating Claims: ‘Washington Times’ Writer Says Some Are ‘Accurate’ (confirms two women)

Hollywood Life ^ | Fri, March 25, 2016 4:47pm EDT | by Emy LaCroix

[Pirate Ragnar]

“You act and think like a liberal. THIS IS TRULY IMMORAL AND DISGUSTING.”

Thank you for that. Who passed around Alinsky to all the Trumpbots?

[tophat9000]

If it is true and Heidi is finding out about it like this, it is terrible.

I think she knew... I think Ted & Heidi had a Bill & Hillary political power couple arrangement and aspirations

[trebb]

Whatever. Now hold Trump to the same standard.

LOL! Funny how you sway about when it looks like those who vindicated Cruz might be right then shrug it off when it looks like it may be correct - and you call those for Trump "bots"....any wonder why some folks see some of the Cruz folks who go nuts inventing stuff about Trump while ignoring stuff about Cruz - pathetic?

[manc]

where did I say he is like Clinton, I never.
I have noticed you twist the words of freepers to suit your attack.

[JediJones]

This fired Washington Times writer told people last month NOT to vote for Cruz in Texas. He said he was a Rubio supporter. Totally biased source!

Dear Texas- Don't vote for #Cruz. If he loses TX, he gets out & #Rubio has a head-to-head with #Trump. That's the only way Trump could lose.— Drew Johnson (@Drews_Views) February 26, 2016

[dforest]

Supposedly Cruz may have some near future problems with donations and PAC coordination coming too.

The info is out there.

[JediJones]

Drudge knows this makes Trump look bad, with his operative Roger Stone the only one quoted in the article, which even the Enquirer admitted to Michael Savage’s people is all made-up.

[Smokin' Joe]

Actually, I just want to see the same "standards" (that's a semantic howler) applied to everyone.

I thought double standards were a Democrat thing.

But then, those who support the Clinton donor just might have different (more Democratic) standards.

Go ahead, show the country those New York (City) Values, where 21% of the voting age population are not American Citizens.

As for inventing stuff about Trump, I have to give the Trumpettes credit. There just hasn't been time.

Trump supporters have been really busy. So many Trumpettes have been so busy bashing Cruz (and supporters) they haven't even had time to make an 'about' page here, in years since their signup date. Their posting history sometimes reads like a twitter feed with all the @this and #that, and they apparently have time to read that stuff (or their handlers do) and post it here. Which, of course, keeps Cruz supporters busy fielding the foul balls and doesn't leave much time to talk about issues.

I suppose that's the real aim of all this horsecrap, obscuring positions on the issues and any discussion of what those might mean for the future of this Republic, past the bumper sticker slogan level.

Even more distressing, however, is that it has taken the level of discussion here below (oxymoron alert) tabloid journalism.

I don't think Trump or his supporters or his positions would do well in a discussion of issues.

Whenever I bring up Trump's stated intent (in Iowa) to keep the EPA and how that is at odds with restoring American industry...>crickets<...

Or, the more common reaction is --OH! SHINY!-- and off to another installment of the Adventures of "Lyin' Ted" and how someone who has been posting for a month that they "have had it" are "done with Cruz", for the third week in a row, (must be held over by populist demand) is 'finally done with Cruz' again...

Any attempt to compare the similarities between the economic and social situations leading to popular (middle class) angst, unrest, and political vulnerability in America today and Germany in the '30s is greeted promptly with the Politically Correct recitation of Godwin's Law (decried by its namesake for stifling historical discussion), end of discussion.

There are thousands of tabloid level he said/she said sites out there, especially in a day and age when those posting from grandma's basement piggybacking on the neighbor's wi-fi are desperately seeking relevance and maybe a little pizza money. What has made this site great is the discussion of issues, not fawning over some guy with a little money who just might be tied in at every level with the very people his supporters decry. Because someone who has no political record except as a schmoozer and donor (with/to Democrats) just might not be the pig you thought you were going to get in that poke.

If he is elected, I won't know whether to laugh or cry when he turns around on Jan 20, 2017 and says to y'all "I'm here. You're Fired!"