Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Reveals New Details About Its Probe Into Hillary Clinton's Use of Private Email Server
news.vice.com ^ | 3/26/2016 | Jason Leopold

Posted on 03/26/2016 11:26:59 AM PDT by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: GrandJediMasterYoda

She’d just say it wasn’t her, somebody hacked into her computer. It never ends even when you get caught with your hand in the cookie jar.


21 posted on 03/26/2016 12:03:21 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

I do not expect this to be concluded that quickly, but as long as it is still hanging out there it will be an excellent weapon in Trump’s hands. “I don’t know about an FBI investigation and there is a CRIMINAL investigation ongoing for months; but I can tell you that if an employee of MINE set up a private server storing confidential business information it. He would be FIRED immediately and SUED for violating contractual stipulations.”

Then in any debate, if he even decides to debate the hag, he will NOT allow any “moderator” to get away from this issue or to Candy Crowley him.

While it is easy to become disillusioned about the seemingly glacial pace of this, it is clearer by the day that this is an almost insoluble problem for her.


22 posted on 03/26/2016 12:03:32 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

They didn’t need be “given access”. They need only know that the server _existed_, at which point suitable talent could be hired to acquire the contents while she maintained plausible deniability. A wink-and-nod is enough to assure donations and speaking gigs would occur, involving lots of digits.


23 posted on 03/26/2016 12:04:39 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

I don’t understand your point.


24 posted on 03/26/2016 12:05:26 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Hillary was given the Blackberry as part of the Obama administration's insistence that all Gov't staff use Blackberrys because the gov't had set those up on a secure system with secure accounts.

Hillary wanted the government system installed on her other phone. The FBI told her it would be too costly and time consuming to do so for just her phone. They told her she was on her own and couldn't help her if she didn't use the Blackberry.

She didn't, and instead had the server that Bill and she had been using for all the Clinton Foundation stuff moved and set up to give her her own 'email server'.

25 posted on 03/26/2016 12:07:09 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Note the language used by the geek “no unauthorized access” was found. That to me means there was authorized access. It could be in the manner you speak of but knowing the greed I would assume it would not be available unless the cash was delivered.


26 posted on 03/26/2016 12:08:08 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

I am not bein a smartass but did you read the whole article for starters ?


27 posted on 03/26/2016 12:09:48 PM PDT by advertising guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

I agree Trump should make this an issue every day of the campaign but continued bashing is going to be of limited usefulness without the hard evidence of an investigation to back it up.


28 posted on 03/26/2016 12:11:34 PM PDT by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

I see little chance of Hussein not being able to run out a clock. But she is not going to escape the consequences when he is the nominee.


29 posted on 03/26/2016 12:13:29 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Yes, I did. How would the plaintiff matter?

Just tell me what you are thinking.


30 posted on 03/26/2016 12:14:52 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
On the day he said he decided not to run, I saw the scenario in which he would ride in on his white horse and save the party. Hillary delegates would go to him, not Bernie.


31 posted on 03/26/2016 12:15:53 PM PDT by doug from upland (Some of you keep telling yourself -- Romney would have been as bad or worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Then you agree a foia request was made,correct ? So the next question would be,who requested, then what happened and why

Well the Judge refused the lawful request on grounds of factual evidence not allowed in the media group knowledge via a foia request


32 posted on 03/26/2016 12:18:05 PM PDT by advertising guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rktman

33 posted on 03/26/2016 12:20:20 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

My theory is that the server was sort of a spy smorgasbord.

Contributors to the Foundation were given access and take what was of interest. This way there are no specific information requests which could compromise Mrs Cosby.


I agree.


34 posted on 03/26/2016 12:21:16 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Well there are going to be consequences certainly for the FBI as well in terms of its reputation and politicizing the process is this all goes down for her in the middle of a general election campaign.


35 posted on 03/26/2016 12:21:33 PM PDT by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

A request is only that, and this one is not likely to be granted.

I understand the urge for brevity but some things have to be spelled out to be understandable.


36 posted on 03/26/2016 12:25:03 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

And she could be next POTUS! I find that absolutely mind boggling, and it shows just how much these pukes do not care about this country. If she isn’t indicted, I hope the FBI leaks like crazy, let the people see first hand the kind of government they got.


37 posted on 03/26/2016 12:26:39 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Uh, "pending"? Did I miss something? I thought it was "on-going".

A definitions of "pending" is "on-going" or "open".

38 posted on 03/26/2016 12:28:37 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

Case dismissed - Trump screams POLITICS, Corruption, Favoritism.

Case continues - Trump quietly, but firmly and consistently intones about just how serious this CRIMINAL investigation must be to have taken so long. “Just what massive breaches of National Security have occurred that require such secrecy” “What is she hiding? “Why are several Congressional investigations ongoing?”|

This is gold, Jerry, gold.


39 posted on 03/26/2016 12:29:41 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

My mind stopped being boggleable when an ineligible man was sworn in without anyone speaking up. That marked the end of the constitution as for as the Establishment is concerned now it will only follow it if it is in its interest to do so.


40 posted on 03/26/2016 12:32:40 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson