Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former CIA Experts: Ted Cruz Appears Deceptive in His Response to Sex Scandal
Law News ^ | 2:18 pm, March 27th, 2016 | by Phil Houston and Don Tennant

Posted on 03/27/2016 1:51:48 PM PDT by drewh

Phil Houston is CEO of QVerity, a training and consulting company specializing in detecting deception by employing a model he developed while at the Central Intelligence Agency. He has conducted thousands of interviews and interrogations for the CIA and other federal agencies. His colleague Don Tennant contributed to this report.

The eyebrow-raising story that appeared earlier this week in the National Enquirer, citing claims that Sen. Ted Cruz had engaged in five extramarital affairs, drew a sharp response from the Republican presidential contender. Sharp as it was, however, it was strikingly weak in terms of denial, and strong in terms of attack. And that combination is a telltale sign of deception that leads us to conclude that this is a matter that warrants further investigation.

The statement that Cruz released on his Facebook page on Friday immediately drew our attention:

“I want to be crystal clear: these attacks are garbage. For Donald J. Trump to enlist his friends at the National Enquirer and his political henchmen to do his bidding shows you that there is no low Donald won’t go. These smears are completely false, they’re offensive to Heidi and me, they’re offensive to our daughters, and they’re offensive to everyone Donald continues to personally attack. Donald Trump’s consistently disgraceful behavior is beneath the office we are seeking and we are not going to follow.”

Subsequently speaking about the matter, Cruz echoed that sentiment, with even more intensity (you can watch below). He said:

“The National Enquirer published a story. It is a story that quoted one source on the record: Roger Stone, Donald Trump’s chief political advisor. Let me be clear, this National Enquirer story is garbage. It is complete and utter lies. It is a tabloid smear, and it is a smear that has come from Donald Trump and his henchmen. It is attacking my family, and what is striking is Donald’s henchman, Roger Stone, had for months been foreshadowing that this attack was coming. It’s not surprising that Donald Trump’s tweet occurs the day before the attack comes out. And I would note that Mr. Stone is a man who has 50 years of dirty tricks behind him. He’s a man for whom a term was coined for copulating with a rodent. Well let me be clear: Donald Trump may be a rat, but I have no desire to copulate with him. And this garbage does not belong in politics. The National Enquirer has endorsed Donald Trump, has said he must be President. And so Donald, when he’s losing, when he’s scared, when Republicans are uniting against him, decides to peddle sleaze and slime. You know, Donald is fond of giving people nicknames. With this pattern, he should not be surprised to see people calling him, ‘Sleazy Donald.’”

We should note that these two statements constitute the only material that we currently have at our disposal to analyze, which is far from ideal. Obviously, the more material available for analysis, the greater our confidence in our findings. With that said, however, we were struck by the volume of deceptive behavior that we identified in these statements.

Behaviorally, when the facts are the ally of an individual, he or she almost always tends to focus on the facts of the matter at hand. In this case, if the key fact was that he had not had these affairs, Cruz would almost certainly have been much more strongly focused on the denial. That is, he very likely would have made a point of explicitly stating something along the lines of, “I did not have these affairs.”

Yet at no point in either statement did Cruz say that. He implied it by saying the allegations are false, and that they’re lies, but behaviorally, such statements are not equivalent to saying he never had the affairs. Even if we were to overlook that fact and consider his statements to be a denial, there is an overwhelmingly higher proportion of attack behavior compared to the effort expended at denial. This type of lopsided attack-to-denial ratio is very consistent with what we have historically seen with deceptive people when allegations are levied against them.

Given the lack of additional information upon which to conduct a more comprehensive behavioral analysis, this is nothing more than our initial opinion and assessment, and we will continue to follow this matter very closely. At the same time, we cannot help but conclude at this point that it’s not looking good for Sen. Cruz.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; california; canadian; carlyfiorina; conspiracy; copulated; cruzie; election2016; ineligible; lyinted; newyork; tedcruz; texas; trashy; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-251 next last
To: nopardons
teach the n00bs just WHAT FR has always been

The n00bs think Trump is rough they ain't seen nothing.

141 posted on 03/27/2016 4:44:10 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert

Wow,really, high fashion models are “porn stars”?


142 posted on 03/27/2016 4:50:00 PM PDT by crosdaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: GeaugaRepublican
Maybe. In the current environment and with the right organization in place its easy to destroy any candidate with innuendo alone.

If Trump wins the nomination he'll have his turn fending off nameless informers and against vague charges, in the press every single day. Heaven knows there's enough material out there already.

I have a feeling the general campaign will be epic.

143 posted on 03/27/2016 4:50:10 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Tsunami style!


144 posted on 03/27/2016 4:51:45 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: drewh
"He’s a man for whom a term was coined for copulating with a rodent." Ted Cruz refering to Roger Stone

Sometimes parsing words can be a good thing.

145 posted on 03/27/2016 4:54:01 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

You know what, if you want to be Ted Cruz’s judge, jury and executioner be my guest. Trump is an adulterer too. Let’s string them both up and send Hillary a present for her Inauguration.


146 posted on 03/27/2016 4:58:24 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

If Trump is caught cheating on Melanina, I’m done!


147 posted on 03/27/2016 5:00:38 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

“The NSA knows the truth about Cruz”.

The POTUS ultimately has access to all of their info and this is what makes this high tech surveillance so dangerous to democracy. You think Obama did not have something on Chief Justice Roberts? Our country is corrupt.


148 posted on 03/27/2016 5:01:38 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Political correctness should be defined as news media that exposes political corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Trump has been a target of the New York Media since the early eighties. Its easily as bad as the British tabloid media.

Trump may be the most thoroughly vetted Republican candidate we have seen in 100 years.

Every scandal brought forth has already been in the papers. Many stories are are going back 30-35 years ago.

Does not mean the media won’t try.


149 posted on 03/27/2016 5:04:04 PM PDT by GeaugaRepublican ("Donald Trump is the last hope for America" Phyllis Schlafly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: drewh
"I did not have these affairs." . . . what an expert would have expected to hear if someone was telling the truth.

"I did not have sex with that woman" Bill Clinton

"Let me be clear, this National Enquirer story is garbage. It is complete and utter lies. It is a tabloid smear, . . . " Ted Cruz

You be the expert.

If part 2 of this act does not transpire soon . . . then Ted would be most likely telling the truth. However, it no longer matters because he has been found guilty in the court of public opinion. Public opinion matters more than truth.

150 posted on 03/27/2016 5:04:10 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeaugaRepublican

We shall see.


151 posted on 03/27/2016 5:05:04 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Incidentally, adultery is not illegal in Texas but it is in New York, where luckily for Mr. Trump the last adultery case was prosecuted in 1944. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to learn something new.


152 posted on 03/27/2016 5:05:14 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Still waiting for Heidi to come out with a “Stand by her man” statement, odd that it hasn’t happened yet.

She is campaigning with him, isn’t she?

- - - - - - - - - - -

:)

I don’t know.

I think she was campaigning with him.


153 posted on 03/27/2016 5:08:03 PM PDT by onyx (You're here posting, so sign-up to DONATE MONTHLY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Brilliant. The only other analogy would be of a picture of the Cruz supporters going down with the Titanic.


154 posted on 03/27/2016 5:13:42 PM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; nopardons
Once we did the Cops Cheer, as it was known, for Drew Barrymore in front of the White House Correspondents Association dinner.

Thanks for the reminder. I couldn't remember exactly which high-brow event the 'Cops Cheer' was used, but that must have been it.

Was it you (sauropod) who used to dress up in a devil costume as "Hillary's brother," or was it someone else?

Hard to believe we've been active on FR for almost 20 years now.

155 posted on 03/27/2016 5:17:15 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (...and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many... Daniel 8:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Aria
I had read at the beginning of primary season that it was Rubio with the woman problem.

Foam parties and gay pickup parks.

156 posted on 03/27/2016 5:20:04 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
At most a private matter between Cruz and his wife . . . ? ? ? ? And I suppose leaking and selling US government information is between shillary and the state department, or perhaps just her and her 'god'??????? Try buying some common sense.
157 posted on 03/27/2016 5:21:58 PM PDT by chit*chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

You forget that Cruz started saying a couple of weeks ago that the attacks on him were coming. Proved out that he was aware of the rumors and expected the attacks.

Not one of the major media nor any of the pundits who were appproached by the Rubio camp thought the allegations were provable on the evidence presented and didn’t publish them.

Only the pro=Trump Enquirer, whose CEO, Mr. Pecker, is a big buddy of Trump published the story—and because they didn’t have any proof they repeatedly used highly suspicious ‘deflecting’ words like ‘rumored’, “alledged”, “supposedly”.

If a man says the allegations are completely false, I think it encompasses all points of the allegations.


158 posted on 03/27/2016 5:22:43 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Makes you wonder how the Golden Sacks and other donors select their Presidential hopefuls to back.

Clearly they try to hedge their bets, not knowing which will be successful. Perhaps they use the following criteria in selecting the perfect candidates to support:

  1. A good public speaker
  2. Someone who appeals to a certain demographic -- Cruz was supposedly Evangelical and Tea Party. Rubio was the young Jack Kennedy -- attractive to Hispanics and GOPe.
  3. Someone who can be controlled and proven to carry the water for key issues like -- Cheap Labor Express and TPP.
  4. Past history flaws that are useful to exploit in the general election. For instance, if Cruz got the nomination he would have fulfilled the donor's mission of taking out a guy like Trump, but then sacrificed to make way for the more controllable Clinton.

159 posted on 03/27/2016 5:22:52 PM PDT by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
And Ash for 3. And Quidam.

And, quidam's term for Ken Starr --the turtle.

160 posted on 03/27/2016 5:23:45 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (...and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many... Daniel 8:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson