Posted on 04/14/2016 6:19:35 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts
NP, bomb it.
Actually the queeranus commands them to provide aid and comfort for the mohamicidals. Technically they are enemy saboteurs/ non combat support personnel.
Perhaps FEDGOV can airdrop supplies and munitions to the poor refugees who are trying to make it in Mexico. Fast and Furious 2.0. Hillaryous Rotten Criminal, who gave birth to Barry’s JV, can get it done in January 2017.
I'm glad you thought of that. But who do we tell... Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder? :(
________________________________________________________________________________________
"Paid for by our tax dollars, that is, to Catholic and Lutheran Charities, who make a ton of profit off the import of these primitives."
"Congressman Barton speaks following Lakeview tour"
esp watch last 10 min: interview with 'church' organizer Matt Authier (who's on the take)
(notice how Authier is continuously and nervously bobbing his head up and down
-hoping to speed up each question and get the interview over with)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59J0i3LNoY8
*****
As an aside, I saw my very first muslim terrorist yesterday in Target.
He was wiping his snot from his runny nose on the produce and then putting the produce back. I circled them a few times to confirm. He had an imam with him, as well as a Mexican handler, who looked embarrassed.
The imam was yakking loudly on the phone to announce their presence. You know, as a form of territory marking like ghetto people do with their stereos - “I’m here; respect me”.
The Mexican was obviously a paid assistant. And our tax dollars are Paid to Catholic, Lutheran and Baptist Charities, who make a ton of profit off the import of these primitives.as obviously a paid assistant -
6 posted on April 8, 2016 at 3:09:55 PM CDT by T-Bone Texan
*****
The way it was explaind to me is this:
The church group (not just Catholic Charities, there are others profiting from this treason, like Lutheran and Baptist groups) gets a contract from the FedGov. They then provide “services” to the terrorist.
One of these services is integrating the terrorist into our society, and they will take the terrorist on field trips wherein they learn how to game the system, exploit our kindness, and in my case wipe their snot on veggies/produce that other people will buy in an attempt to make them sick.
But make no mistake, Catholic Charites and many other religious groups have recently signed very lucrative contracts with the FedGov, and thus when they announce that helping terrorists is moral and godly, I ask “Who profits from this action? - Cui bono?”
These groups are very happy to take the govt’s money, and the collateral damage that is the utter destruction of our culture
They should be your enemy too.
PS: The handler was Mexican. He was a product of Mexican culture and he was otherwise unrelated to the terrorist and the imam culturally. He even looked embarrassed, which is a “tell” vs muslims, who never seem to have a sense of shame, only arrogance and entitlement.
7 posted on April 8, 2016 at 3:11:29 PM CDT by T-Bone Texan
Mexico needs to become the second nation that has suffered a nuclear strike (at Anapra).
Exactly. It's not as if Mexico has an air force or standing army that could actually do anything about the U.S. flying over their border and wiping out a few terrorist training camps on their soil .....<> A REAL President would've done exactly that already and told Mexico to STFU if they complained.
agreed!
Date of story: APRIL 14, 2015
I read that it would take NINETEEN feds to keep an eye on ONE person of interest.
We likely have tens of thousands of these people.
the math is bad.
Indeed !!
Its ok, they are protected by the White House. Meanwhile, Ft Bliss is not.
I believe I read about this a while ago. But as yet have not heard of anything being done about it.
______________________
Where are you, Gregg Abbott?!
There are many good reaons to build the Wall, but this is certainly the most important reason. The liberals will say that the Muslims will just fly over the Wall with their prayer rugs, which should tell you about the reality that liberals live in.
That this isn’t national top story news everywhere is a travesty. If it is true. I believe it. The Wall is necessary to our survival. If we don’t get one, some of us will die. You cannot trust Mexico, where payoffs determine all official business. If these camps exist, the local cops are paid handsomely by ISIS to not see them.
M4L ISIS camps
Mexican Intelligence says... wow.
An ISIS camp in Gworgia, how the hell could that be legal? Are they on tourist visas? Why do we have any tourists from those regions? Vote Trump.
As a Texan and retired military the inaction really pisses me off.
You DID read about this a while ago; Judicial Watch published the item one year ago, in April 2015. The report received scant attention from the media (what a surprise). The few reporters who followed up on the story went to the usual suspects (DHS, DOJ) who assured them that ISIS is not operating a camp along the U.S.-Mexican border.
Here’s a blog post that provides a bit more detail:
http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2015/04/along-border.html
Judicial Watch actually posted claims about an ISIS camp opposite El Paso in the summer of 2014 and again last spring. The first report was followed by a flurry of increased security at Fort Bliss, the massive Army post in El Paso. However, the commanding general said the new security measures were not in response to an ISIS threat.
Spent a fair amount of time in El Paso on business in 2012 and 2013; Americans were advised exercise extreme caution when traveling south of the border in that area. Ciudad Juarez, the city on the Mexican side of the border, was long known as the “murder capital of the world,” and the State Department issued a travel warning for the city as recently as last year. Conditions in the city have supposedly improved, but I wouldn’t go there. In that environment, it would be easy for ISIS to set up shop and thrive.
One final note: when the first Judicial Watch report appeared almost two years ago, the FBI convened a meeting at the US consulate in Juarez, to coordinate expected media inquiries about the ISIS threat. If there was no local threat from the terror group, why hold a meeting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.