Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA takes to Facebook to shut down climate change deniers in the most brutal way
The Mirror ^ | 14 Apr 2016 | Jeff Parsons

Posted on 04/14/2016 7:31:52 PM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Paladin2
nothing to do with nasa/space I just find it funny-- the Olympic 1936 basketball team----


41 posted on 04/14/2016 9:04:04 PM PDT by ghosthost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: detective

The communists have taken over NASA along with the rest of the government. I guess we can call them envirocommies.


42 posted on 04/14/2016 9:12:40 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA

Looks like NASA better take themselves off of Facebook.

43 posted on 04/14/2016 9:17:08 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
NASA Study Showing Massive Ice Growth Debunks UN Claims

Oops!

44 posted on 04/14/2016 9:23:39 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All
Oh, noes!

A German professor has confirmed what skeptics from Britain to the US have long suspected: that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has largely invented “global warming” by tampering with the raw temperature data records.

45 posted on 04/14/2016 9:26:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All
WTF?

Another Prominent Scientist Dissents! Fmr. NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming – ‘Global warming is nonsense’ Top Prof. Declares

46 posted on 04/14/2016 9:29:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

NASA GISS needs to be immediately defunded.


47 posted on 04/14/2016 9:29:13 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Live Free or Die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ghosthost

That’s racist.


48 posted on 04/14/2016 9:31:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All
NASA: Clean-air regs, not CO2, are melting the ice cap

I can't believe what I'm reading!?! Who publishes this crap?

49 posted on 04/14/2016 9:34:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

GISS = Gigantic Insane Science Subsidies?


50 posted on 04/14/2016 9:36:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
I have been a denier since the 89. I attended my first conference in 89 on environmental mathematics, and one topics was global warming. None of the mathematicians or scientists at the conference believed that global warming was caused by man. However I got hold of a study that supported the claim that global warming was because of our use of fossil fuels. In the study the author randomly selected cities around the world and looked at trends over the period of 5 years, and his data supported his claim. So I wrote a program that randomly selected cities around the world and tried to duplicate the author's results. However, no matter how many times I reran the program, my results were always smaller than his, well outside the measurement error.

Now when I do an experiment and I report the results, I always include the measurement error (standard error of the mean). If you do the same experiment and get the same results with in the margin of error, then you have to conclude that you agree that my results are possibly correct (we both could be wrong). Now if you get results that are outside the measurement error, then we know that either I am wrong, or you did the experiment incorrectly.

I contacted the author, and requested his data, which he refused to provide. That is a RED FLAG. If I am wrong I want to know it, and I would gladly give you any data that you wanted. Good or bad, I want the truth.

Years later I found out that the author faked the data to support his claim. The fact that a scientist would cook the books with his data is simply horrible. What is science if it is not the search for the truth.

It was about that time that I took my first course in chaotic dynamical systems (cds). Weather is a cds, which means there is no probability model for weather, because of the sensitive dependence on initial conditions. That course rocked my world, because it destroyed the Foundational concept of mathematics. It was believed by the Hilbert (a great mathematician) that if we know enough about a system then we could predict what would happen. Cds proved him wrong. This means that all predictions about weather, or the climate are just WAGS (wild a$$ guesses). I guess I will be going to jail.

51 posted on 04/14/2016 10:16:17 PM PDT by Do the math (Doug)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Do the math

Do you know what the total estimate global heat produced by man is in comparison to the total estimated heat which arrives on Earth via the Sun? Surely the total estimate man-made heat is many orders less. I would think it would get lost in the data.


52 posted on 04/14/2016 10:46:56 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Do the math

Remember what science was in Galileo’s time. It was to support the overarching dogma.


53 posted on 04/14/2016 10:48:37 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: detective

I haven’t had to wrap myself in wet towels and sit in front of an open refrigerator like I did back one year in the late 1970s so it’s far from the hottest year.

Oooooh, took to facebook with a graph!!!!!!!


54 posted on 04/14/2016 11:00:59 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan

Changes in climate are inevitable. The causes of climate change are not entirely knowable. They really can only say what they believe but they tend to claim whatever they want to claim and expect that everybody else should believe them.


55 posted on 04/15/2016 12:52:12 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ghosthost

“they’ll be going to Mars in a few decades! At least that’s what they said decades ago.”

Actually they said that back in 1958: “Mars by 1965, Saturn by 1970 ... Project Orion motto - killed government interagency infighting, NASA Apollo conflict, perceived treaty obligations, lack of political leadership.

“...the first time in modern history that a major expansion of human technology has been suppressed for political reasons.” - Freeman Dyson


56 posted on 04/15/2016 6:16:13 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Just keep reminding them that weather is not climate and that the 99% of the atmosphere they cannot model is one form or another of water vapor.


57 posted on 04/15/2016 6:19:55 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PIF

99 Luftballoons just blew past my window. Should I be concerned?


58 posted on 04/15/2016 8:55:23 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Who knows, perhaps, maybe, if then, or else, could be, maybe not, possibily, if so then ...


59 posted on 04/15/2016 8:57:42 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Duly noted!


60 posted on 04/15/2016 9:01:47 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson