Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Department Office Removed Benghazi Files After Congressional Subpoenas
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 4/21/16 | Alana Goodman

Posted on 04/21/2016 10:04:54 AM PDT by Nachum

State Department officials removed files from the secretary’s office related to the Benghazi attack in Libya and transferred them to another department after receiving congressional subpoenas last spring, delaying the release of the records to Congress for over a year. Attorneys for the State Department said the electronic folders, which contain hundreds of documents related to the Benghazi attack and Libya, were belatedly rediscovered at the end of last year. They said the files had been overlooked by State Department officials because the executive secretary’s office transferred them to another department and flagged them for archiving last April, shortly after receiving

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; clinton; libya
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Obstruction of justice
1 posted on 04/21/2016 10:04:54 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 04/21/2016 10:05:33 AM PDT by Nachum (ISIS is alive... and Chris Stevens is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Sounds to me like more trouble for the Queen who wants to be POTUS.


3 posted on 04/21/2016 10:07:20 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yes Obstruction but of course one needs to find someone who will prosecute it.


4 posted on 04/21/2016 10:08:40 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Hillary's lackeys trying to protect the Queen.They ALL need prison time.
5 posted on 04/21/2016 10:09:04 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

More obfuscation for her Heinous.......................


6 posted on 04/21/2016 10:09:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There should be probably 10-30 indicted, along with Queen Hillary.


7 posted on 04/21/2016 10:10:56 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If I “overlook” something where I work I’m culpable and could go to jail. No names of staffers mentioned as usual.


8 posted on 04/21/2016 10:11:53 AM PDT by subterfuge (TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Unfortunately the whole plan was delay, delay, delay to run out the clock. The Obama DOJ will quite obviously decline to prosecute Hillary and if Her Heinous becomes president the whole issue just goes poof. None dare call it treason at this point.


9 posted on 04/21/2016 10:11:57 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Why aren’t these criminal operatives in prison? Oh, but for return of the Rule of Law.


10 posted on 04/21/2016 10:13:45 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

HRC needs to be in prison 15 times over.


11 posted on 04/21/2016 10:16:35 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

“Yes Obstruction but of course one needs to find someone who will prosecute it.”

Heck, indict EVERYONE. Then wait for someone to break. There is precedence for that: Waco.


12 posted on 04/21/2016 10:16:48 AM PDT by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Protecting the regime and their beastly doings..


13 posted on 04/21/2016 10:17:18 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So the answer for Democrat government employees doing unethical and criminal things is to hire another Democrat government employee to tell them that behavior is wrong?

That will make a difference?

We have a government filled with thieves and liars.


14 posted on 04/21/2016 10:17:50 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaRueLaDue

“Heck, indict EVERYONE. Then wait for someone to break.”

I assume (OK, hope) the FBI is marching up the food chain as I write, making offers of conditional immunity for truthful testimony under oath.


15 posted on 04/21/2016 10:22:44 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean; Republicanprofessor; null and void; Velveeta; Rushmore Rocks; Myrddin; ...

Hillary's lackeys trying to protect the Queen. They ALL need prison time.

Why would anyone vote for this criminal?

16 posted on 04/21/2016 10:23:12 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Only 2 reasons

1) Evil

2) Stupid


17 posted on 04/21/2016 10:24:30 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

3) Or both.


18 posted on 04/21/2016 10:27:12 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
No names of staffers mentioned as usual.

Not sure if this lawyer qualifies as a staffer but I wonder how long she had been at State. Sounds to me as if she acted as a "Sweeper"

The most transparent administration ever at work again.

Duval left the State Department last September. She had previously overseen document production for the IRS during the targeting controversy. Republicans had criticized that process after agency emails were reportedly destroyed and a key IRS official’s hard drive was shredded months after they had been subpoenaed by Congress.

19 posted on 04/21/2016 10:32:07 AM PDT by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LaRueLaDue

I agree but my point is who will prosecute an obstruction referral....it is a rhetorical question as we know that has to be the department of injustice. I Want long odds that Lynch is going to approve such a prosecution. In fact, make it an exacta, prosecution of the obstruction and the clinton e mail indictment....probably pays 500 to one.


20 posted on 04/21/2016 10:33:19 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson