Posted on 04/25/2016 8:02:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
While you couldn’t tell it from most of the headlines over the past 18 months, there’s actually some good news on the law enforcement front. Violent crime rates continued to drop over the past two years on a national per capita basis, including the murder rate. The motto of if it bleeds, it leads likely keeps the focus of many news media consumers on some regularly occurring violence, but overall we’re still experiencing record low levels of the worst violence in the modern era, as was described this past winter by the Washington Post.
In 1993, there were seven homicides by firearm for every 100,000 Americans, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By 2013, that figure had fallen by nearly half, to 3.6 — a total of 11,208 firearm homicides. The number of victims of crimes involving guns that did not result in death (such as robberies) declined even more precipitously, from 725 per 100,000 people in 1993 to 175 in 2013.
Most of that decrease obviously was the result of a national reset in our approach to law enforcement in the early to mid nineties, including Bill Clinton’s much maligned crime bill (which his wife now claims was a mistake) but local efforts in cities along the same lines contributed as well. Believe it or not, that trend continued through 2014 and 2015 across the nation as a whole. Murder and other gun related violent crimes have continued to dip or at least remain flat at levels not seen in the living memory of the majority of voters.
Sadly, that doesn’t apply everywhere. There’s been an uptick in both the murder and other violent crime rates which have halted that good progress on a national level and it’s localized in a few specific areas. The hot spots for homicide probably won’t startle anyone who’s been following the news. (Washington Free Beacon, emphasis added)
Three major cities accounted for more than half of the rise in the national murder rate between 2014 and 2015, a new report shows.
Though overall crime rates were stagnant in America’s 30 largest cities the murder rate rose 13.3 percent, according to a report from the Brennan Center for Justice. The violent crime rate also rose by 3.1% in those major cities, lead by increases in Los Angeles, Baltimore, and Charlotte.
Three cities were also mainly responsible for the rise in murders. “Final data confirm that three cities (Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington, D.C.) account for more than half (244) of the national increase in murders,” the report said.
There are five cities on the two combined lists, with Baltimore winning the prize as the one to achieve a significant increase in both categories of violence. And for the most part they have a few things in common. The first factor – and the one which both liberals and conservatives are likely to agree on – is that these cities are the epicenters for chronic poverty and high unemployment, particularly among minorities. Drug abuse and its associated “business structure” contribute to widespread depression, gang activity and violence. The lack of wealth (aside from government infusions of cash) contributes to structural decay, failing schools and a host of other factors which result in a socioeconomic death spiral, both figuratively and literally.
The second factor is the one which the Left and the media (though I repeat myself) are less eager to discuss. These are all cities which have been governed by Democrats and liberals for generations, choosing more “progressive” policies when it comes to dealing with crime and a firm belief that if we simply keep pouring more and more tax money into failing systems they will somehow right themselves. Almost entirely unmentioned in these public discussions is The Ferguson Effect, and the fact that it’s even harder to keep a lid on violent crime when you begin treating your police officers like the enemy.
You can have this debate on MSNBC and CNN every day of the week, folks, but the numbers speak for themselves. A couple years worth of data is now available and it’s telling a story which at some point will have to be examined. After more than twenty years of progress we are now losing ground to the worst, most violent criminals in some of the most at-risk communities. What we do about it is in the hands of the leaders these cities keep returning to office.
Who was it again who coined the phrase about the definition of madness being, doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results?
Vote for Democrats and pray for Ksick’s nomination.
(That’ll boost more hoping and changing until America is but a memory.)
Guns don’t pull their own triggers.
The demise is already past reversing.
Last year (literally!) was a spike in Baltimore murders due to the riots. Primarily from police backing down and ignoring anything that happened.
It was an aberration.
MD ping.
Yep. This is a huge issue that the liberals and race baiters who are in charge of these cities created. They have made their police forces ineffective. In some areas, there is no more line of defense between the residents and the thugs who prey on them because the police know that if they enforce the law, they will be villainized and may end up in jail themselves on some BS Civil Rights charge. Liberalism and racial politics have destroyed these cities and turned them into lawless zones.
I'm shocked.
Primarily from the mayor (D) ignoring anything that happened and siding with the rioting hooligans.
Baltimore rioted against the police. Now that the police have retreated, who is going to save them from their residents?
All of which share a common political and demographic component.
I do not agree with this portion of the article. This "first factor" basically embraces the "poverty causes crime" theory. The more accurate theory is "crime causes poverty".
Using the "crime causes poverty" theory supports the article making an even more powerful indictment of liberal/Democrat/progressive mishandling of crime. Then again, liberals/Democrats/progressives thrive on crime.
‘The more accurate theory is “crime causes poverty”.’
True. The reason why the middle class has fled so many inner cities is crime. It’s downhill from there.
There is crime and there is government theft. They are morally similar, but, with government writing the laws, only one is illegal. Why are/were communist countries so poor? From investor to worker, individuals were only allowed to make so much, the rest to be confiscated. Excessive taxation and regulation has a similar effect.
I got 2.5 correct. I waffled between DC and LA for my thrid pick.
Sure they do. Evil gun makers and the NRA design them that way on purpose. Innocent gangbangers go out and accidently murder each other every day... it's got to be the guns' fault since they're all just innocent little children.
Concur. Well stated!
Has anyone asked the fools at the Washington Post HOW many murders in Chicago were by NRA members this year?
Jazz Shaw gets it...
I guessed right! What do I win?
Stop paying Democrats to breed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.