Posted on 05/20/2016 9:18:43 AM PDT by Kaslin
When a man and a woman make love, the miracles of conception and birth are possible. When two men attempt the same, the most glorious result possible is an anal discharge of semen mixed with fecal matter. Yet in our current age, the intellects of those who are our societal elites – from Supreme Court Justices to executives in boardrooms to the President now occupying the Oval Office – are completely unable to detect any important difference between the two. Likewise, they are incapable of discerning a difference between male and female and the significance of complementarity.
Clearly, something is awry with prevailing views of marriage and human dignity when anal discharge constitutes consummation and genitalia are no longer indicative of gender. The Self-Appointed Elites of our world have descended into depravity and are intent on taking each of us – especially our children and grandchildren – along with them.
Genderlessness and Same-Sex Marriage: Grand Pretensions
To be intellectually honest and true to myself, I had to move beyond the gay moniker.[i] Many have said I am deceiving myself, that I am self-loathing, and that I have knuckled under to archaic societal norms.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Ping for your kids future Megan dear.
character matters
To liberals sex has nothing to do with procreation. That’s just collateral damage. Thus the love of abortions. To them sex is all about fun. And the more the merrier. Including animals and little kids. They’re a sick bunch of freaks. And evil.
And the sand-castle virtues are all swept away in
The tidal destruction
The moral melee.
The elastic retreat rings the close of play
As the last wave uncovers
The newfangled way.
LGBT argument on man and woman have sex and produce a child. They cite, the inability of hetero’s who are infertile and adopt. I think this was a Court argument- should marriage be based on the ability to procreate or not.
I am no way defending their argument, just stating their thinking and defense argument.
My response has always been that the difference is this: NO two men, nor ANY two women, can naturally conceive and bear a child. Individual cases of infertile couples are the straw man the homosexual lobby always uses.
Great article.
Absolutely. I don’t have to show that a hetero couple can ALWAYS produce children, I just have to show that a homo couple can NEVER produce children.
An argument that should have been used in Obergefell:
Why does the law recognize rape of a woman as something qualitatively different than simple assault? And why is the law’s position on rape unrelated to the potential fertility of the victim?
No holds barred article. Good.
No two ways about it. Homosexual couples do not reproduce and the process of genetic evolution that was passed down to them by their parents ends. They are the collateral damage of the Culture of Death.
We have become so intelligent, sophisticated and wise, we have finally evolved to a higher plane of awareness unattained by generations of primitive people who came before us, to realize there is no such thing as male and female.
Now that’s progressive.
Infertility on the part of either spouse used to be grounds for divorce or even an annulment.
I intend to sign up for term life insurance, as a 24 year old female, to get the lowest rates.
(I wam a 68 yr. old male in my previous life)
Could an insurance company deny me, and be at odds with the FedGov, if I do this?
Impossibilities become believable by many when a culture relies on civil law to define marriage for them.
Freegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
