Posted on 05/20/2016 4:28:35 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
That one got the series canceled in a LOT of newspapers.
You're 100 percent correct. This is about who gets to define "normal." This is about the power to define reality, or at least the law's version of it. It's about creating a government so powerful and so out of touch that it can, by fiat, create an entirely new reality in which men are women, women are men, up is down, and wrong is right.
It's about total nihilism.
Most of us see Orwell’s 1984 as a warning. The left sees it as a blueprint.
They also see “Idiocracy” as aspirational.
I’ve been thinking . . . Democrats (in and out of the propaganda arm called “the media”) mystify the Constitution as if it were a long, impenetrable document rather than being, even with the first ten amendments, a matter of a relatively few pages.IMHO Republicans should make a point of how accessible the Constitution actually is. And should try to embarrass journalists who insinuate that it is nothing but a bunch of technicalities.
No “fluids” in the Movie IDIOCRACY,
Except for Brauwndo.
“It is a mental illness to not accept what you see when you look in your underwear.”
Yes, its akin to anorexia, body dysphoria. Only those are not political agendas and are treated appropriately in a mental health setting.
A couple of weeks ago the *sshole announced that we are a gender fluid society. No, Barry, that is not who we are. Why don't you go F yourself.
“The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution.”
Probably lots of therapy sessions - most are mentally ill well beyond the "sexual orientation crisis" and a huge number have also been terribly abused as children - to cater to them is to feed the sickness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.