Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not a hard decision, snowflakes are horrified.
1 posted on 05/30/2016 7:59:13 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

No one cares what the Disco Era boy Montini thinks anyway.


2 posted on 05/30/2016 8:02:17 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Hal Lindsey touched on the subject of free speech and actions on college campuses on the latest episode of The Hal Lindsey Report.


3 posted on 05/30/2016 8:13:40 PM PDT by Smittie (Just like an alien, I'm a stranger in a strange land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I’ve lived in Arizona for years. I even taught night classes at Glendale College. As usual, EJ Montini is full of beans. Keeping others from exercising their rights by force is NOT in the American tradition.


4 posted on 05/30/2016 8:17:00 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Less than $9.9k to go, let's git 'er done!

LOOKING FOR YELLOW

Please click pic to donate or become a MONTHLY DONOR

6 posted on 05/30/2016 8:27:58 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

>>Montini called the amendment to HB 2548 the “Donald Trump Exception” and argued America has a long tradition of protesters occupying offices, blocking traffic, and refusing to leave lunch counters.

>>“I understand why some politicians don’t like it,” Montini wrote. “But threatening citizens with heavy fines and jail time isn’t a way to protect free speech. It’s a way to shut people up.”

Montini needs to get a clue as to the difference between free speech and infringing on my right to free speech and freedom of travel. And occupying an office is trespassing plain and simple, not “free speech” as he attempts to assert.


7 posted on 05/30/2016 8:33:57 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

As usual the pinkos claim that obstructing opposing viewpoints is somehow an exercise in free speech.


10 posted on 05/30/2016 9:11:41 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Love this!!


13 posted on 05/30/2016 9:37:22 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The very leaders of the schools today restricting free speech of others were the hippies demanding free speech way back.

And often their speech was far from respectful. Not even getting into the riots and burning buildings.


14 posted on 05/30/2016 9:48:57 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

.
E.J. Montini is a typical newspaper doofus.


15 posted on 05/30/2016 10:00:32 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Montini called the amendment to HB 2548 the “Donald Trump Exception” and argued America has a long tradition of protesters occupying offices, blocking traffic, and refusing to leave lunch counters.
“I understand why some politicians don't like it,” Montini wrote. “But threatening citizens with heavy fines and jail time isn’t a way to protect free speech. It’s a way to shut people up.

Morons like Monyini are who made redundant legislation necessary!”
Why should additional legislation be necessary to safeguard the very First Amendment? To shut up for good imbeciles like Montini.
And it's disgusting to equate racial civil rights like refusing to leave a lunch counter to blocking traffic and endangering potentially tens of thousands.
Far as I know no federal or state constitution has given special powers for the mentally deficient (or judge, but I repeat myself) to write laws inhibiting free speech directly or indirectly.

Unfortunately those same morons will define bullhorns or blocking access to free association, or badgering a non-willing stranger to listen, as "freedom of speech."
THOSE morons also must be just as vigorously stomped on (figuratively) with fines, as well as mandatory jail time.

Enough is enough!

16 posted on 05/30/2016 11:05:42 PM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Bravo
Arizona
17 posted on 05/30/2016 11:40:40 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Suppression of free speech has been a tool of tyrants for a 2000 years, and yet some criminals still support it.


18 posted on 05/31/2016 1:26:12 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

1st Amendment? How ‘bout the 2nd?

Starts to get into ‘scary territory’ with the 5th; making everything THINK RE: colleges sucking down the illegal taxpayer $$..../semi-s


19 posted on 05/31/2016 9:56:33 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson