Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton may face Racketeering Charges [?]
Inquisitr ^ | 05/30/2016 | Frank Huguenard

Posted on 05/31/2016 6:41:47 AM PDT by safetysign

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: EQAndyBuzz

Check out post #35 for a way the _resident can solve the problem for the democrats (pronounced demon rats).


41 posted on 05/31/2016 7:57:27 AM PDT by Kalam (<: The answer is 42 :>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: duckman
>>Imo, not a thing will happen to her.<<

You're probably right, but if the FBI does request indictments and the DOJ does not act on the findings, what the FBI knows will end up being leaked.

Perjury, obstruction of justice/investigation, tampering w/evidence, conspiracy, influence peddling...and so on will destroy her campaign for president.

As far as I'm concerned...it'll be mission accomplished. Hill and Bill will never see the white house again.

42 posted on 05/31/2016 7:58:10 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
Hillary Clinton may face Racketeering Charges

I may get the Publishers Clearing House Check today too.

43 posted on 05/31/2016 8:07:30 AM PDT by itsahoot (Trump is a fumble mouthed blowhard that can't finish a sentence, but he will finish a term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Imagine there’s no Clintons
It’s easy if you try
None of the Hell they bring us
So many people would not have died
Imagine all those people
Still being alive today.....

Imagine there’s no Bimbos
It isn’t hard to do
No Gennifer or Paula
No Juanita or Monica too.
Imagine all those women
Allowed to live a life in peace.....

You may say that’s just a dream
And you’re not the only one
But it’s time for the Hell to end
Let’s send Hillary to the pen.....


44 posted on 05/31/2016 8:14:43 AM PDT by Iron Munro (WAS THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride
“I know you are disappointed by not getting the big job, but heres the deal. Set up your foundation, Hilly gets SOS, you leverage that into $$$ for yourselves and thats your reward , just don’t get me involved.....”

I believe the Clinton Family Foundation pre-dates HRC’s first run for Prez (although it originally was called something else). Also, I think that kind of scheming is the Clintons’ forte, not Obama’s. Finally, I think Obama had zero guilt about beating out HRC for the nomination. He didn't like her then, and he detests her now.

45 posted on 05/31/2016 8:15:32 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kempster
My question: If the FBI finds that Hillary should face charges for her reckless abandon for rules and regulations regarding EMails and protecting Classified Information and the Attorney General decides not to bring charges will they not set new precedent for the over 21 million other government workers?

Not to mention those already convicted and sentenced for similar activity.

"Precedent" in legal terms involves court decisions, so the DOJ's declining to bring formal charges *in this case* doesn't factor in. Prosecutorial discretion is often abused for political reasons.

46 posted on 05/31/2016 8:23:18 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Hillary Supporter: Racketeering? Did she cheat in some tennis match?


47 posted on 05/31/2016 8:30:24 AM PDT by HypatiaTaught
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Monkeys may fly out of my butt.


48 posted on 05/31/2016 8:33:00 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kahuna

One can only dream of a Trump/Christie prosecution. My question is can Obama pardon Hillary? Or is this investigation all for naught?


49 posted on 05/31/2016 8:35:22 AM PDT by Phyllis1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Can Obama pardon her?


50 posted on 05/31/2016 8:35:22 AM PDT by Phyllis1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Phyllis1

Yep...


51 posted on 05/31/2016 8:36:30 AM PDT by nikos1121 (The Golden Age of Pericles is about to begin again... in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
Under RICO, the sections most relevant in this case will be section 1503 (obstruction of justice), section 1510 (obstruction of criminal investigations) and section 1511 (obstruction of State or local law enforcement). As in the case with Richard Nixon after the Watergate Break-in, it’s the cover-up of a crime that will be the Clintons’ downfall.

OBSTRUCTION. STONEWALLING. PLEADING THE 5TH. PERJURY. FAILURE TO COOPERATE WITH CONGRESS AND INVESTIGATORS.

Why hasn't RICO been cited to indict the entire criminal treasonous cabal for the same and worse during the past several years?

52 posted on 05/31/2016 8:47:33 AM PDT by HangUpNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

There has never been a source cited for this guy’s assertion.


53 posted on 05/31/2016 8:58:00 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckman

Yeah, I’m betting on espionage too... but racketeering could come into play with the money laundering over at the ‘foundation’...


54 posted on 05/31/2016 9:22:14 AM PDT by GOPJ (Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

May....may....may.
Waiting for...will...will...will


55 posted on 05/31/2016 9:29:41 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

RICO ,RICO, RICO...


56 posted on 05/31/2016 10:10:28 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

I believe the Clinton Family Foundation pre-dates HRC’s first run for Prez (although it originally was called something else). Also, I think that kind of scheming is the Clintons’ forte, not Obama’s. Finally, I think Obama had zero guilt about beating out HRC for the nomination. He didn’t like her then, and he detests her now.


Could be that the deal was ok you have this, you use it for your own enrichment. Agree. The Clintons probably said “ here’s what we want in return for supporting you” and he said ok


57 posted on 05/31/2016 1:29:32 PM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson