Posted on 06/14/2016 10:00:03 AM PDT by jazusamo
Former President Bill Clinton said Tuesday that more people would have died at the terrorist attack at a nightclub in Orlando over the weekend if club-goers had been armed and shot back at the lone gunman.
Speaking in an interview with Bloomberg Live at the Clinton Global Initiative, the former president was asked to respond to Donald Trump
s claim that there would have been fewer deaths if those at the nightclub had been carrying firearms.
Did you see how dark it was? Clinton said. Its likely that more people would have been killed.
A gunman of Afghan descent who claims to have been inspired by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria killed 49 people and wounded dozens more in an attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando in the early hours of Sunday morning.
Omar Mateen, who was killed after an hours-long stand-off with police, was armed with a handgun and an AR-15 rifle affixed with high-capacity magazines that permit the rapid firing of ammunition.
It was the worst mass shooting in U.S. history and worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11.
The tragedy has reignited debate over the nations gun, immigration and intelligence gathering laws, as well as political correctness and the nature of Islam.
Clinton on Tuesday pushed for a ban on assault weapons, arguing that gun deaths dropped sharply after he signed a ban as president in the 1994. The act expired in 2004.
It worked pretty well, Clinton said of the ban.. Then when it was allowed to expire. For a while we didnt seem to have uptick in crime, but look at what happened with big weapons at Sandy Hook and Aurora, Colorado and most recently in Orlando and San Bernardino, California.
Its clear that if youre firing a lot of ammunition in a short amount of time with a weapon designed to kill, more people will die than if youre stuck with a pistol, Clinton continued. If [the Orlando shooter] just had a pistol, nobody believes he could have killed 49 people.
Hey! It works with the timid, the weak-minded, and the women who are so afraid of a gun that they would not pick one up off of the table. Same thing applies to roaches and mice.
SCARE THE WOMEN AND THE TIMID! The creedo of the Democrat Party. Do it and they will gleefully through all of their God given rights right down the drain in exchange for the word...SAFETY!
How ignorant can they be.
I think it’s the same disease that did old Al Capone in...VD.
... It is a typical “Godless reaction” From those who have separated themselves from the reality of what “is” is
You simply can’t fix stupid
The Bill Clinton finger wagging commcerial with Hillary lying to reporters is exceptional.
Obama/Hillary/Bill have given Trump more material than he could ever use.
This election is OVER.
Well said.
Go Trump Go!
yes and a prez. who has a aa.battery on the roof of his house maned 24/7.
Oh snicker snicker snicker.
Mateen would have been shot PDQ and maybe, MAYBE, there would have been a few collateral injuries and casualties (as in those on the other side of Mateen) but not this big slaughter.
Another person at the club was, in fact, armed and returned fire, forcing the moho into the bathroom and likely saving some, perhaps many, lives.
There was an armed person in the club that he didn’t know about.
It is not over until George Soros has had his say.
Good, I expect you to Disband your Secret Service Detail permanently.
While it is possible, I suppose, that one or two celebrants at the night club might have been injured or possibly killed from a stray bullet from the multiple guns pointed at the shooter immediately after he fired the first shot, I cannot fathom that 50 people would have been killed, and 50 more injured. This is nonsense!
Adjust your fire, head shot. If it's wired with a dead man trigger it goes off. But you can be assured a muzzie with a bomb is going to set it off anyway.
You are better off taking the shot, then waiting to be shot then blown up anyway.
Syphilis attacks the brain.
what an idiot if there had been 0ne or two men in there with a conceal carry and trained to use the weapon the 50 killed would of been reduced to under a half dozen.
what an idiot if there had been 0ne or two men in there with a conceal carry and trained to use the weapon the 50 killed would of been reduced to under a half dozen.
Ccws hit 82% of the time. Policemen hit 18%.
The dude would have been on the ground immediately.
Then why send the police in there Slick? If it is dark and you can’t see what the shoot they might accidentally shot an innocent person. Can police see in the dark? Is is okay if the police accidentally shot an innocent person trying to stop a maniac but the guy who might be armed standing by the manic needs to stand down?
Liberals, logic and common sense just do not mix.
You can tell me what you would have done all day, but you weren’t there.
Being insulting to someone who is trying to analyze this is childish on your part.
I am trying to figure out how one guy shoots over a hundred people in a packed building with a rifle. Putting a rifle up to your shoulder is hard to do in a packed place. The rifle is sticking out and is easier to grab than a pistol.
Perhaps the victims saw the bomb trigger and were hesitant to try and knock down the rifle for fear that he would set off the bomb.
Common courtesy not your strong suit?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.