Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Man can't be punished 'simply for being homeless' [Boston MA]
Associated Press ^ | Jun. 23, 2016 1:47 PM EDT | Denise Lavoie

Posted on 06/23/2016 11:26:35 AM PDT by Olog-hai

A homeless man convicted of criminal trespassing for taking shelter in privately owned buildings during harsh winter weather won a new trial Thursday when the state’s highest court ruled that he should have been allowed to argue it was his only way to protect himself from the cold.

The Supreme Judicial Court found that the judge at David Magadini’s trial was wrong to deny a request to instruct the jury on a so-called necessity defense. Magadini wanted to use that defense to argue that his behavior was justified for a person trying to escape extreme temperatures. […]

The owners of three properties in Great Barrington had obtained no-trespass orders against Magadini. He was convicted of seven counts of criminal trespass for entering the buildings in February, March, April and June of 2014, and was sentenced to 30 days in jail. …

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: boston; criminaltrespass; greatbarrington; homeless; liberalagenda; privateproperty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: carriage_hill

Excellent reply!! d:^)


21 posted on 06/23/2016 12:07:54 PM PDT by CopperTop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

But he can be punished for not having healthcare. Welcome to Amerika 2016


22 posted on 06/23/2016 12:09:50 PM PDT by usafa92 (Trump 2016 - Destroying the GOPe while Making America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
If true that his life was in imminent harm [..]

Is it immaterial that he, himself, put his life into imminent danger, by choosing that lifestyle?

Regards,

23 posted on 06/23/2016 12:20:23 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

3 hots and a cot for him in jail.


24 posted on 06/23/2016 12:22:10 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Crooked Hillary's going down and I aint talkin about, on Huma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

Problem is it will not be kept narrowly. Not with todays courts and judge campaign contributing lawyers.


25 posted on 06/23/2016 12:25:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rey

Private property has never been an absolute right. Ask any mariner about the duty to render aid.


26 posted on 06/23/2016 12:27:14 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Yup, the later breakins nullify the extreme weather defense 100%.


27 posted on 06/23/2016 12:28:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Most likely. That’s why his defense should and will probably fail.

I’m not taking up for the guy. I am a fan of the “competing harms” doctrine and I like it to get its legs stretched often.


28 posted on 06/23/2016 12:30:20 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Wow, I didn't catch that!

If Boston is having sub zero temperatures in June, maybe those "climate deniers" have a point.

29 posted on 06/23/2016 12:32:24 PM PDT by boop (Where IS Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

Private property has never been an absolute right.
Marxists, who openly pursue the abolition of private property, count on people believing that.

Ask any mariner about the duty to render aid.
That does not appear to follow. Also, there is no universal duty thereof, legally speaking.
30 posted on 06/23/2016 12:36:17 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Where is Pope Francis? Has he no compassion? Why didn’t the Catholic Church take him in??


31 posted on 06/23/2016 12:38:48 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

Spoken like a northeaserner who never has to deal with Mexico.

If he slipped through going the wrong way he would be dead.


32 posted on 06/23/2016 12:58:08 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He can be punished for breaking and entering!


33 posted on 06/23/2016 1:04:16 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

There are plenty of shelters he could have gone to.It is about 85 degrees outside.
The places are almost empty in the summer.


34 posted on 06/23/2016 1:17:31 PM PDT by freedomtrail (EEOC- Eventual Elimination Of Caucasians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“But they are so mean with all kinds of mean and nasty conditions. Some of them require that you are sober. Some even require that you listen to someone say grace over the food before it is served.”

Or they’re places where you get robbed, assaulted and/or raped. Sometimes just for fun by the cops who are supposed to protect you...

Can’t say how I know here but I have first-hand knowledge of what goes on in those places.


35 posted on 06/23/2016 1:26:37 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
It costs money to render aid to a mariner in distress. Nevertheless, that duty is universally recognized and is enshrined in law. A vessel that can render aid to a mariner in distress without danger to itself or its occupants is legally obliged to do so. Nothing Marxist about it.

According to the US Coast Guard: All ship and aircraft commanders have an obligation to assist those in danger of being lost at sea. This long recognized duty of mariners permits assistance entry into the territorial sea by vessels, and, under certain circumstances, aircraft, without permission of the coastal state to engage in bona fide efforts to render emergency assistance to those in danger or distress at sea. This right is independent of the right of innocent passage, transit passage, and archipelagic sea lanes passage and is recognized in Article 18.2 of the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. These efforts to render assistance must be undertaken in good faith and not as a subterfuge. This right applies only when the danger or distress is reasonably well known. It does not extend to entering the territorial sea to conduct a search.

...

Both the 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas and the 1982 LOS Convention provide that every state shall require the master of a vessel flying its flag, insofar as can be done without serious danger to the ship, crew, or passengers, to render assistance to any person found at sea in danger of being lost and to proceed with all possible speed to the rescue of persons in distress if informed of their need for assistance, insofar as it can reasonably be expected.

In addition, SOLAS requires the master of every merchant ship and private vessel to assist persons in distress and to broadcast warning messages with respect to dangerous conditions or hazards encountered at sea.

36 posted on 06/23/2016 1:35:59 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Why don’t these free loaders pay “their fair share?” If Obama would force everyone to buy a home there would be no homelessness.


37 posted on 06/23/2016 3:28:33 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Freddy the Freeloader couldn’t get into jail when it was freezing.


38 posted on 06/23/2016 4:09:08 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus
Find it hard to believe that there were no shelters he could have gone to.

count yourself fortunate that you "find it hard to believe." That probably meant that you've never found yourself in that situation.

Shelters have limited 'beds' and when full they turn people away...and in the worst of weather, they fill up fast. - and people freeze to death.

39 posted on 06/23/2016 4:11:35 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (A Christian is as a Christian does - "By their works...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
We have a porous border. He could go to Mexico and escape our harsh winters.

It's only porous one way.

You cross into Mexico illegally, you're a criminal. You been 'on vacation'

40 posted on 06/23/2016 4:14:44 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (A Christian is as a Christian does - "By their works...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson