Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mika Rips Media Blackout on Clinton-Lynch Meeting: ‘People Too Afraid to Talk About the Truth’
Legal Insurrection ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 06/30/2016 5:58:06 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

Wow! Mika Brzezinski absolutely ripped into Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch today for holding a private meeting earlier this week. More importantly, the Morning Joe host clearly seemed to swipe at the rest of the media and punditry class for refusing to focus on the outrage.

When Mark Halperin said “I bet you they didn’t talk about” the FBI investigation of Hillary, Brzezinski literally laughed in his face. “Come on, stop! Everybody stop! Okay, well this is why this is never going to be a problem for Hillary Clinton. People are too afraid to talk about the truth.” In a parting shot, Mika said “we’ll just move on, just like everyone else does. Even though it’s a complete sham.”

View the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: benghazicoverup; billclinton; clintoncrimefamily; expartecoverup; fbi4expartevisit; gangsterism; hillarycriminalprobe; lorettalynch; lynchclintonmeeting; mikabrzezinski; obamalawless; privatemeeting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Spok

I’m assuming a face to face meeting was necessary, because, well she’s not going to e-mail Lynch.


21 posted on 06/30/2016 6:18:47 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Richard Nixon continues to accelerate as he spins in his grave.


22 posted on 06/30/2016 6:20:07 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

The following is from LameCherry:

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2016/06/clinton-lynching.html

{{excerpt}}Bill Clinton lured Loretta Lynch into this meeting with the promise of being an informant. Clinton was going to provide information on someone in the cartel concerning money laundering to the Obama regime to save Bill and Hillary from prosecution.

Lynch was offered the replacement seat of Merrick Garland, who would be followed through on the Supreme Court as an “Obama nominee” for an easy win for President Hillary. Lynch was to be on the DC Appeals Court if she creates a prosecutorial diversion.

Lynch deemed the offer beneath her, and expected the Supreme Court. Inquiry points to that this being exposed here, Lynch in this time line is moved to go public on this.

The person of interest the Clintons are opting to throw to the wolves is from the Mideast, connected to Benghazi and to take the fall for this situation.

The Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the United States was just offered quid pro quo, and not a very attractive one to end up a pariah and in prison the rest of your days if things go south.

Is what inquiry states in the matrix. I am not going to track down the patsy in this, but they should figure this out, as it is brilliant in tanning the Obama regime with the connection, setting the Clinton’s free, and burying one of the saps.

Once again another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

********************************************************

I take this info with a grain of salt, but it sounds as though the Clintons have underestimated AG Loretta and insulted her, all at the same time.


23 posted on 06/30/2016 6:20:18 AM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Yup!


24 posted on 06/30/2016 6:20:31 AM PDT by Flick Lives (TRIGGER WARNING - Posts may require application of sarcasm filter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

These Career Criminals are in the open. However, there apparently is no one in any position of authority who has the integrity to do anything about these criminals. Pathetic.


25 posted on 06/30/2016 6:20:36 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Thank you.


26 posted on 06/30/2016 6:20:50 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Trump is exposing the Fifth Column in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

I agree. It reminds me of when the light bulb finally clicked on, for some of Bubba’s closest aids, during the Lewinsky scandal. Bubba had assured them that all the accusations were nonsense...and they believed him. They were crestfallen when they figured out he had lied to them.

I think Mika just came to her first realization that the Clintons are crooked...that look on her face is her inventorying all the Clinton crimes she’s excused in the past.


27 posted on 06/30/2016 6:22:05 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Do you know who that schmuck clintonista was who said, they only wanted to “talk about community policing” With a straight face?

I don’t know who he is, or his credentials for being on the air; but I know a jerk when I see one!


28 posted on 06/30/2016 6:23:14 AM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
clearly seemed to swipe at the rest of the media and punditry class for refusing to focus on the outrage.

Charlie Rose This Morning stated for the record, this was nothing to focus on, all good. Boy are they tone deaf.

29 posted on 06/30/2016 6:23:16 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Does Mika actually believe that media cares about truth? She hasn’t figured out yet that truth is the enemy of the left. When she does, she won’t care about truth either.


30 posted on 06/30/2016 6:23:45 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Quote:

“if Comey does not issue a criminal referral, Clinton wins.
The time to expose the fix is NOW.”

Judge Jeanine gave the definitive answer:

There will be NO referral for indictment because Hillary’s first witness called would be Barack Hussein Obama, which would “cause a crisis in the Government which would be detrimental to the country.”

As they say in our thoroughly corrupt government and media: “It’s time to move on.”


31 posted on 06/30/2016 6:25:14 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Breath the fine air Loretta. Isn’t it great?

It could stop. Or.....you could stay on at your job.

Your life after indictment won’t be worth a plug nickel


32 posted on 06/30/2016 6:26:56 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.examiner.com/article/joe-scarborough-s-dirty-little-secret


33 posted on 06/30/2016 6:30:07 AM PDT by LadyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

if Lynch has been underestimated, she would recuse.


34 posted on 06/30/2016 6:30:45 AM PDT by dontreadthis (I finally came up with this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis
Independent Prosecutor NOW

Full on revolt, NOW.

35 posted on 06/30/2016 6:31:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

I heard her say that.
But what is more detrimental, this or that?


36 posted on 06/30/2016 6:34:44 AM PDT by dontreadthis (I finally came up with this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Interesting; she used the word “truth” in a Clinton context.


37 posted on 06/30/2016 6:35:59 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer
Judge Jeanine gave the definitive answer:...There will be NO referral for indictment because Hillary’s first witness called would be Barack Hussein Obama

I didn't see this. Why would she call Obama as a witness?

38 posted on 06/30/2016 6:38:57 AM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

In 1974 there was no issue whatsoever as the Republicans joined with the Democrats and the Media in the coup to oust Nixon.

In 2016 NO Republican, NO Media, and certainly no Democrats that will join together to even question Barack Hussein Obama. “The First Black President,” much less attempt to remove him from office.

Because Hillary emailed Obama, thus implicating him, NOTHING will come of “Email-Gate.”

Race, Gender, and Sexual Preference are over everything else in this dying country.


39 posted on 06/30/2016 6:42:36 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It stinks. It stinks to high heaven and the Clinton Crime Family is going to get away with it.


40 posted on 06/30/2016 6:44:10 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson