Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Something is wrong with this picture
SovereignMan.com ^ | April 18, 2012 | simon black

Posted on 07/05/2016 4:26:04 PM PDT by vannrox

The US Passport Act of 1926 is an obscure piece of legislation that was enacted decades ago when the idea of passports starting catching fire around the world.

Subsequently absorbed into US Code Title 22, the law was originally intended to authorize and issue passports for US citizens to travel abroad.

Several years ago, the law was modified to provide the Secretary of State with the authority to revoke or deny a passport to any US citizen convicted of engaging in immoral acts with minors overseas.

Until now, this has been the only instance of excluding a US citizen from travel abroad. But if Senator Barbara Boxer gets her way, there’s going to be one more.

As part of Senate Bill 1813 (known as MAP-21), Congress has inserted language that would oblige the Secretary of State to revoke or deny a passport to any US citizen that the IRS Commissioner deems as having ‘seriously delinquent tax debt.’

For the purposes of MAP-21, ‘seriously delinquent tax debt’ is defined as an amount in excess of $50,000 in which a notice of lien or levy has been filed in public records.

Bear in mind, this is strictly an administrative procedure; there is no due process. By comparison, even pedophiles go in front of a judge before losing their passports.

Something is wrong with this picture.

News of the 1676-page bill has broken across mainstream media outlets. Forbes, Fox Business, the Atlantic, Businessweek… everyone is reporting on this now.

So far, though, no one in Washington has shown any attention of backing down.

I’ve taken the time to actually read the entire bill myself… I wanted to ensure that I understood it fully before telling you about it. And believe it or not, there are even dumber provisions within.

For starters, in what may be one of the most depraved Big Brother moves on record, section 31406 of the bill makes it mandatory for ‘black box’ event recorders to be installed in every new passenger vehicle starting with model year 2015.

Section 31504 requires the development of special alarm systems designed to remind drivers that there are other passengers in the vehicle. Duh.

Then there are provisions for more taxpayer funding to subsidize the massively loss-making Amtrak… plus calls to develop more national, regional, and state-owned railways across the country.

Perhaps most important, though, is Title II of the bill– ‘Stop Taxhaven Abuse.’

Long story short, if the US government decides in its sole discretion that a foreign jurisdiction is impeding tax enforcement, Uncle Sam can shut them out of the US financial system, no questions asked.

It’s just another measure to turn foreign banks into unpaid spies of the federal government… and limit financial freedom for US citizens.

This is a bully move, plain and simple. Most of the global financial system depends on US banks for correspondent accounts. When you wire money from Cambodia to Brazil, for example, the funds pass through New York.

But these kill switch provisions are actually on very shaky legal ground. As several banker and attorney friends of mine in popular offshore jurisdictions like Panama and Labuan have told me, the new bill violates a host of trade agreements.

Moreover, it may prove to be the final nail in the coffin for US dominance in global banking… it’s almost as if Congress is daring the international community to come up with a better alternative.

As China opens its currency and economy more and more each day, it seems painfully obvious that a new solution is coming soon.

Meanwhile, US citizens would do well to start focusing on taking action while the window is still open. This involves seeking a second passport (lest you have yours revoked), moving gold out of the country, and establishing a foreign bank account.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crime; irs; passport; ruleofforce; travel
This is an older article. Legislation was passed at the height of the Obama / Democrat giddiness. All that needs to happen is to be accused of something and you lose your passport and are locked in or locked out of the USA.

Like it or hate it. How would you feel if your beloved country says you cannot visit Mexico, Canada or the Bahamas. What if the reason was because the IRS felt that you under paid by $1. And to fight them cost you five years worth of income?

Where is the Bill of Rights in all of this?

1 posted on 07/05/2016 4:26:04 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Bill of Rights? The Law? I think it is pretty clear today that such things are illusions. The word of the King is all that matters in America.


2 posted on 07/05/2016 4:30:21 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Do I need a passport to visit Mexico or Canada?


3 posted on 07/05/2016 4:32:10 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

For reading later when I;m not FUMING!!!!


4 posted on 07/05/2016 4:33:01 PM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

There’s no constitutional rights. The law is whatever our rulers say they are today. The law is whatever they say they are tomorrow. They may not be the same as yesterday, and they may only apply to you, but not someone else, depending what our rulers say.


5 posted on 07/05/2016 4:34:24 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Yes


6 posted on 07/05/2016 4:45:47 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
Do I need a passport to visit Mexico or Canada?

Post 9-11-2001, yes, you do...

the infowarrior

7 posted on 07/05/2016 4:48:47 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

yes.


8 posted on 07/05/2016 4:52:36 PM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (10 rounds 10 meters 10 seconds 10 centimetres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
depends,,, here in NY an Enhanced drivers license gets you across the border into Canada and back
9 posted on 07/05/2016 4:57:01 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

TTIUWP

Of course I didn’t read the article.


10 posted on 07/05/2016 7:49:48 PM PDT by corbe (mystified, still. But never hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

That you need a passport to go to Canada or Mexico is news to my family. We’ve gone back and forth to both Canada and Mexico with no passport... and with only a cursory look at drivers license of the driver. No check of ID of the passengers.


11 posted on 07/06/2016 4:01:09 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson