Posted on 07/06/2016 12:25:57 PM PDT by springwater13
“Santorum would be better than Newtie.”
Oh, no. Another loser has-been. Haven’t we had enough candidates who couldn’t even deliver their home states?
I thought we had a much deeper bench than this. Surely we have young, exciting, up-and-coming conservatives somewhere in this great country? We shouldn’t have to trot out these warmed-over rejects. Not if we actually want to win.
Foley. Gingrich. Hastert. Pelosi. Boehner. Ryan. None of these does not belong.
Scott Brown was the RINOest member of the Senate.
Horrible choice. Horrible, horrible, horrible.
That deseserves thought
Newt, much as I like him, would be a mistake. He brings nothing electorally, he is a strategist and a how-to guy.
what about the old thing...
get young blood in there... perhaps... start with newt and change to young blood for the second term...
i could do that...
t
” he is a strategist and a how-to guy.”
That’s the point. He also can handle himself in the media, and can be the knowledgeable attack dog. We dont need another person put up in the hopes that some sentimental claptrap will somehow “win over” the press, like being a women, or black, or a veteran, or in a wheelchair.
And what name that has been floated, actually brings anything themselves?
And please dont say Scott Walker.
Hopefully after election Trump will push for Hensarling as SOTH.
He needs a worthy ally, not a globalist scumbag.
That is what I favor. 1st term maybe with Newt-although I would still sooner see him as chief advisor to the congress, and then the 2nd term run with a younger guy.
No, but he does become the President of the Senate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.