Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gregg Jarrett: Could Hillary serve as president if her security clearance is revoked?
Fox News.com ^ | July 7, 2016 | Gregg Jarret

Posted on 07/07/2016 11:47:04 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: justa-hairyape

Exactly, who in their right mind would?


41 posted on 07/07/2016 5:11:39 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

Unfortunately the idiot voters from New York elected her as Senator


42 posted on 07/07/2016 5:13:28 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
Look, if the witch becomes President it's more stuff to sell...more palms can be greased, more paid hacks to fill war rooms to wage against American citizens.

Bill Clinton's 'speeches' will go for a million bucks EACH - all three minutes of 'em. The pretense will be gone... it's a bribe - the three minutes is just a way to stick to people offended by bribes. The FBI will tell citizens to sit down and shut up - that Clinton had 'no intent' to accept a bribe... but we better not do the same... Eff the jerks.

Democrats will clean up - anyone who doesn't 'buy' a speech will get Clinton thugs called on 'em. WE live in a hellhole...

43 posted on 07/07/2016 5:15:55 PM PDT by GOPJ ("Crooked Hillary has the violent thug vote" - - Freeper Reeses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Indeed


44 posted on 07/07/2016 6:54:01 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Commander-in-Chief doesn’t need a security clearance. They can see whatever information they want that isn’t blocked by some personal privacy law.

This is a well-intentioned article I’m sure, but with an absurd premise. “The government”? The President IS the executive branch of government and the ultimate arbiter of who gets security clearances.

Change the premise to a simple “Can this witch be trusted to be President?” and answer it, “no”.


45 posted on 07/08/2016 12:47:23 AM PDT by Impy (Never Shillery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave would have never been elected had the drive-by media vetted him.

No question. However, I have to wonder. If I was able to see through Zero's disguise, and if I was aware of the grave responsibilities of self-government, why weren't the majority of what remains of our Citizenry?

Now, I know much of the reason for that does rest upon 'the Media,' and also with decisions made by a moribund education establishment, but if the Media is dead, then aren't we then the media?

What's at stake in every election is not the fate of candidates, it is all of our fates.

Until the People know that all government derives "their just powers from the consent of the governed" they will continue to slip back to their endless flight into the tall grass in a vain attempt to escape, like Adam, from the awesome responsibilities that come from knowing good and evil.

46 posted on 07/10/2016 11:37:44 AM PDT by Prospero (Lex est rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson