Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Even Trump’s enemies are taking his side in battle with Ginsburg
New York Post ^ | July 13, 2016 | By Daniel Halper

Posted on 07/13/2016 9:36:40 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Just mythoughts
Who is pulling her strings?

Milt Romney.

41 posted on 07/14/2016 3:27:57 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

The ‘old people smell’ in a nursing home is similar to the ‘smell’ in a nursery full of babies. Ick to both.


42 posted on 07/14/2016 3:34:30 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: onyx

“The old, liberal hag never deserved or merited appointment.”

The US Senate disagreed with you in 1993. She was confirmed by a vote of 93 to 3. She was known to be extremely liberal at the time of her appointment based on her history of decisions on the federal bench as well as her service as general counsel of the American Civil Liberties Union.

All but three Republicans (Helms, Nickles, and Smith) lined up to vote for Ginsburg even though during her confirmation hearing she indicated she would not subscribe to a narrow approach to deciding if the Constitution includes rights not specified in the text.

It is interesting how the Republicans supported such a far left judge in mass shortly after the brutal scorched earth campaigns by the Democrats against the nominations to the Court Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas by a Republican president. A year later Republicans overwhelmingly voted to approve another leftist - Stephen Breyer - to the court.

More evidence the “conservative” Republicans in the Senate value membership in the club more than their sworn duty to the Constitution and the people. They demonstrate time after time they have no stomach for a fight on principle.


43 posted on 07/14/2016 3:43:54 AM PDT by Soul of the South (Tomorrow is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

How much is Trump paying this repulsive old bag to say these things?


44 posted on 07/14/2016 4:35:00 AM PDT by Vehmgericht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

LOL. BTTT


45 posted on 07/14/2016 4:46:37 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

She has the type of dementia where one becomes mean. She is demented and doesn’t know it. Being old is the indicator. Being nasty is the symptom


46 posted on 07/14/2016 4:48:59 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

she knows she will be dead in a month


47 posted on 07/14/2016 5:02:29 AM PDT by maddogtiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
She doesn’t think she did anything wrong. Typical leftist.

We elected her to the supreme court so she could be our ruler for life. Oops, we did not elect her.

48 posted on 07/14/2016 5:16:09 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ("And, if you're not queen, my dear, think you that you're wronged?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

LS has a good explanation for this - she exposed the liberal side of the court for what they really are, ideological, politcal hacks.


49 posted on 07/14/2016 5:20:15 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Brain rot due being a LIBTARD who has had to many cancer treatments!


50 posted on 07/14/2016 6:19:13 AM PDT by GailA (If politicians won't keep their promises to the Military, they won't keep them to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

There will be no recusal if this election were to end up in the supreme Court. Liberals reject anyone who questions their ethics or lack thereof. Ethics and laws are for little people, there will be no recusal.


51 posted on 07/14/2016 6:52:53 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Sadly, you are very likely correct.


52 posted on 07/14/2016 7:07:18 AM PDT by matthew fuller (Obama Strategy: Disarm, divide, disrupt, diminish, desecrate, and destroy USA and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sarge83

AP story on her apology is SEVEN WORDS LONG:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/APNEWSALERT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-07-14-10-13-08


53 posted on 07/14/2016 8:22:12 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
... she has to recuse herself if there’s an election-related dispute that goes up to the Supreme Court (Like Bush/Gore did).

I was about to post the same thing! Ruth stepped in it big time when she opened her mouth disparaging Trump and letting her opinion of him be known. No apology can erase that and since it is a very good possibility that the results of this election will be decided in the courts (all the way to the SC), she would definitely have to recuse herself.

54 posted on 07/14/2016 11:19:18 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Buzzy’s liberal friends reminded her that she may have a role in the election and this is her attempt to reinsert herself into that potential outcome. There will be no recusal.


55 posted on 07/14/2016 11:58:43 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

Pee/urine.


56 posted on 07/14/2016 12:14:23 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (Trump, or no more republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson