Skip to comments.
Erick Ericson: I Now Believe Donald Trump Is On Track to Win the Presidency
Conservative News 24/7 ^
| Erick Ericson
Posted on 07/25/2016 5:20:51 AM PDT by ErikJohnsky
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: ErikJohnsky
I read the whole article. What he’s saying is right in line with the dem talking points.
In other words, this is terrible and it’s all:
Putin’s Fault.
41
posted on
07/25/2016 6:07:25 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: Ticonderoga34
We could careless what you think..
We know Trump will win
Unless he implodes and that is slim to none now
42
posted on
07/25/2016 6:07:45 AM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: drpix
” He’s once again in lock-step with the Democrats, this time claiming that the Russians hacked the DNC & Hillary to help Trump. “
This may be one instance where the Democrats have blundered into the truth. There’s some evidence that this DNC material was on Russian servers at some point before it was dumped. wikileaks is very possibly a Russian intelligence operation and not just a merry band of amateur hackers.
43
posted on
07/25/2016 6:07:58 AM PDT
by
Pelham
(Best.Election.Ever)
To: ErikJohnsky
#NeverTrumper being panicked....
Can the Democrats be far behind?
44
posted on
07/25/2016 6:09:57 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: 38special
“One thing Trump doesnt have is a favorable demographic landscape.”
And we have No Borders Bush and the rest of the GOPe treason lobby to thank for that. Importing millions of future Democrats.
45
posted on
07/25/2016 6:10:19 AM PDT
by
Pelham
(Best.Election.Ever)
To: ErikJohnsky
In Eric’s words... Trump will win because Putin is in charge of the world, and that should give everyone pause. Seriously?
46
posted on
07/25/2016 6:12:08 AM PDT
by
Katya
To: ErikJohnsky
Erick Ericson is a sleazeball. I wouldn’t accept his endorsement.
47
posted on
07/25/2016 6:12:53 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(How about investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation)
To: RummyChick
48
posted on
07/25/2016 6:18:01 AM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
To: ErikJohnsky
this guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about, even if his conclusion is correct.
49
posted on
07/25/2016 6:18:08 AM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: ErikJohnsky
Still dead to me, Mr. Erick E.
50
posted on
07/25/2016 6:18:29 AM PDT
by
freedomjusticeruleoflaw
(Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
To: ErikJohnsky
51
posted on
07/25/2016 6:20:17 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(Never Killary!)
To: Celtic Conservative
I am thinking Mercer. The post on FR talked about all the connections to different media sites and Erick’s was one of them .Whoever is associated with it behind the scenes is the person.
To: Katya
If you say say so, sure. Its like a gift falling from the lap of the gods."
53
posted on
07/25/2016 6:21:51 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Pelham
My point: Erikson reveals himself in what he's very concerned only about and what he expresses no concern about.
Concern for the source of the truth (the DNC emails) but no concern for what those email exposes about the Democrat AND no concern that the Democrats are so sure the Russians hack the DNC's protected server and so sure that the Russians did not hack Hillary's unprotected illegal server.
54
posted on
07/25/2016 6:25:04 AM PDT
by
drpix
To: Pelham
CORRECTION: "...what he's very concerned only about and what... "
55
posted on
07/25/2016 6:30:49 AM PDT
by
drpix
To: Bigg Red
56
posted on
07/25/2016 6:35:24 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(You're on fire, stupid!)
To: ErikJohnsky
Hillary not getting that Moscow love she and Bill got when she sold them 20% of our Uranium.
57
posted on
07/25/2016 6:36:08 AM PDT
by
ballplayer
(hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
To: ErikJohnsky
Hillary not getting that Moscow love she and Bill got when she sold them 20% of our Uranium.
58
posted on
07/25/2016 6:36:11 AM PDT
by
ballplayer
(hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
To: mac_truck
Has Ericson denounced Cruz yet?That is a pretty simple test, isn't it?
I'll bet he hasn't, and not only that, I'll bet he condemns Trump's announcement that he will fund a Super Pac against Cruz.
59
posted on
07/25/2016 6:38:32 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
To: drpix
"Before cheering the weasel read his entire article including his last paragraph: "A major American political party is being undermined by a foreign power with the intent to affect the American Presidential election. While those of us on the right can marvel at what the data dump reveals and confirms for us about the Democrats, we should also be very concerned about such foreign interference in our elections."
Sorry Eric, but I'm all about truth and if it takes a foreign government to disclose it - so be it. It certainly doesn't concern me as much as an American television network knowingly using forged National Guard documents to affect a presidential election.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson