Posted on 07/26/2016 2:50:20 AM PDT by Zakeet
OK. Let's say for sake of argument that the DNC hack was a Russian job. How does that change the implication of the server's contents, and of Wasserman-Schulze's emails about rigging the primaries for Hillary? Talking about who is responsible for the hack is just a way for Hillary and the DNC to distract attention from their own corruption.
If a shady character presents undeniable video evidence to the police showing that you're a carjacker, the fact that the reveal was done by a less than morally pure individual doesn't change the fact that you're a thief.
I worked for some of the “initial agencies” during my career - when we got new computers for our networks (both secure and non-secure), they came with a standard throwaway password of “ChangeMe” as a reminder that the first time someone booted up and logged in, they needed to provide a new and secure password before putting operational/classified data on them. It was discovered that sometimes a year or more later, the password was still “ChangeMe”. They have since set it up so the initial user has no choice but to change the password to a secure format before being allowed to continue....
Ryan is probably already accepting legislation proposals from her so he can map strategy for caving.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.