You Could Pay More to Fly Under This EPA Climate Change Rule

Daily Signal ^ | 7/27/16 | Katie Tubb

[jdege]

It was the Right of Departure that was the last defense of the downtrodden serf against his oppressors.

[Lou L]

I'm doing pretty well, financially, but the cost to fly is becoming hard to swallow. One is reduced to depending on sales (which are limited, infrequent, and subject to lots of rules), flying only certain routes, or booking 6 months in advance (which doesn't save much either).

Someone should inform Obama and his EPA that travelers do pay for things like hotels, resorts, rental cars, restaurants, tour guides and numerous other travel services...services that PAY salaries of people on the lower end of the economic scale. Services that in many cases, are already heavily taxed. This ilk just do not understand economics, nor how to really take the reigns off a struggling economy, do they?

[meatloaf]

Low flush (or whatever the official name is) toilets have been mandated for years.

[beethovenfan]

Maybe after November we can start getting rid of this climate change bull$hit.

[VTenigma]

Can anyone point to an EPA rule that requires you to pay less, didn’t think so.

[Dirt for sale]

Seating is also inefficient and un-green. They should all be removed and handles hung from the ceiling. This will allow at least double the passengers and it was already done successfully in Soviet Russia so we know it will work (they were ahead of their time).
Also I don’t believe passengers are humiliated enough before boarding. This can be helped by requiring all passengers to be weighed before boarding, so as to better distribute the bulk.
Forward, comrades.

[2CAVTrooper]

They’re FOS, more policies based on junk science.

There has been numerous studies that show areas surrounding major airports have the same pollution levels as areas 30, 40, 50+ miles away from the airports.