Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton 'loves' the idea of appointing Obama to Supreme Court
The Washington Times ^ | 1/27/2016 | Kelly Riddell

Posted on 08/02/2016 6:03:46 PM PDT by kevcol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: kevcol

Sounds to me like she is trying to win as large a share of the black vote as Obama has.


41 posted on 08/02/2016 6:41:07 PM PDT by eekitsagreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

Be wary if you get the offer to move there...
http://mysite.du.edu/~treddell/3780/Kornbluth_The-Marching-Morons.pdf

The film, “Idiocracy” was loosely based on that story, BTW.


42 posted on 08/02/2016 6:41:21 PM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
The date of your article is WRONG.

This is from January 27, 2016, NOT today.

43 posted on 08/02/2016 6:44:26 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Obama’s liberal vote will count no more than any other liberal she appoints vote.

The only purpose would be to thumb her nose at the right.


44 posted on 08/02/2016 6:46:13 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan

But think how much easier it will be to rule, one ce he convinces the court to vote before hearing any of the arguments.


45 posted on 08/02/2016 6:48:08 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

LOL


46 posted on 08/02/2016 6:48:46 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
weird, go to the homepage: http://www.washingtontimes.com

article link is in the right column "MOST Popular"

every article in that column has an August 2, 2016 date.
47 posted on 08/02/2016 6:49:21 PM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Shouldn’t we check to see if he actually graduated from law school, first? :)

You do not have to be a lawyer in order to be appointed to the Supreme Court, though it helps.

48 posted on 08/02/2016 6:53:36 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

He’s going to want to be in charge of the UN, I’m guessing. America was only ever a stepping stone.


49 posted on 08/02/2016 6:53:49 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (They aren't being radicalized; they're being activated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Thank you.


50 posted on 08/02/2016 6:59:08 PM PDT by Ladysforest (Racism, misogyny, bigotry, xenophobia and vulgarity - with just a smattering of threats and violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
Lookit at 0'nagger's eyes. Freshly elected but has that black anger just beneath his skin. Yuck.

And old 'Wow, wow!' HRC, such a great spontaneous speaker! Rhodes Scholar caliber, she ain't!

World'd be a lot better place without these low caliber critters in it!

51 posted on 08/02/2016 6:59:57 PM PDT by W. (Hillary is just like that ex-partner you've hated forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
Hillary Clinton 'loves' the idea of appointing Obama to Supreme Court

Maybe she does, but even if she ends up in the White House, it's not her call - she can nominate whoever she pleases to the Supreme Court, but the Senate must consent to the nomination. If Senate Republicans have an iota of principle to their names, Obama on the SC will never happen.
52 posted on 08/02/2016 7:21:06 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

That would mean he would have to work and give up Golf times.


53 posted on 08/02/2016 7:23:06 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
She's jumped the shark now!


54 posted on 08/02/2016 7:25:30 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

...Shouldn’t we check to see if he actually graduated from law school, first...

Who took the BAR exam for him???


55 posted on 08/02/2016 7:29:21 PM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

God forbid. Hillary should be sentenced to menial labor for four years, a context in which she would actually have to make eye contact with ‘unimportant’ people - and more importantly, would have to serve them. Service is something she’s never done.


56 posted on 08/02/2016 7:43:09 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Who’s going to hold his teleprompter so he knows what to do?


57 posted on 08/02/2016 7:44:32 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Oh Hell NO!


58 posted on 08/02/2016 7:49:59 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
...she would actually have to make eye contact with ‘unimportant’ people - and more importantly, would have to serve them. Service is something she’s never done.

Yes, actually I'd like to see her in prison "servicing" the Bubbas.

59 posted on 08/02/2016 7:50:08 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Canadians can't be our President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
Wow, what a great idea. No one has ever suggested that to me, I love that, wow," Mrs. Clinton said.

That means it's been in the works all along.

60 posted on 08/02/2016 7:59:09 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Canadians can't be our President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson