I hope the alt right doesn’t contain any of those cis genderers.
“Hillary Clinton is set to deliver an entire speech ...”
That should really excite 15-20 of the people who show up for the speech. The other 30 will be disappointed unless she also talks a lot about the free stuff she will give them.
But it doesn’t matter. The speech isn’t for the audience. It’s to give a few soundbites for the media to obsess over for the next week.
All this alt paleo neo crap makes my head hurt. I’m just a Christian American who happens to be white and happens to lean conservative who is sick and tired of the Evilcrats winning at every turn, so much so that they don’t even care how lame their lies are or how corrupt their leaders are.
For now, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Even if a few have their warts, they are still more desirable than the Evil Incarnate found in the Democrat Party.
If Hillary hates them, what better endorsement could they have?
Just sounds like more alinsky Tactics to me.
Anyone know of/seen an Alt-Right logo ?
Are they gonna super glue the bottom of her shoes to keep her upright or will this be a sit-down speech?
The new version of the “ultra violent dangerous Tea Party”.
If one wants a taste of the world of “alt right”, go to the takimag site.
On the positive side, the articles are generally insightful (and sometimes inciteful), and often amusing; the authors are generally fearless and proudly dismissive of political correctness. The site is a bastion of free speech, and does little (if anything) to moderate comments to posted articles.
On the down side, that freedom attracts an odd crowd to the comments board. While the stable of authors (at least one of whom is Jewish) are mostly at least skeptical of the place Israel holds among US conservatives, a significant number of those who comment at the site are frankly anti-Semitic, and a similar number openly express white supremacist views. Those folks really have a disdain for neo-conservatives (whom they see as Jewish infiltrators) and “cuckservatives” (essentially squishes on the right).
There’s a fine line there - IMO authors like MciInness, Goad, and Shaidle spit in the eye of political correctness without crossing the line into outright craziness, but that’s not the case for lots of those who comment there - they provide a view into the scary side of “alt right”.
Classic Leftist Move.
I have seen ZERO evidence of anti semetism.
Folks, this is simply a replay of 2009 - Media jumped early trying to define Tea Party. They tried to paint us as negatively as possible of everything ‘hateful’ under the sun.
It sounds like a bunch of hokum to me. It is yet another hit piece against conservatives, nothing more.
Were all RINOs now?
>>iannopoulos himself wrote an extensive piece explaining the alt right to Breitbart readers — which drew a large amount of outrage over the perception it painted a sympathetic picture of an extremist group.
Unless the group is planning or executing violent activity, “extremist” is merely an epithet used to marginalize their opinions.
I do not consider myself alt-right, but I have read Mencken, Spengler, Evola, Sam Francis, and many of the writers at Taki’s Mag such as Steve Sailer, John Derbyshire, and Jim Goad. Many of their viewpoints are within the mainstream of conservatism. There views on race and culture are not too different from what one might have read in National Review or Commentary in the 90s.
I think the alt right is the left overs of the Tea Party, Blacks wanting the American Dream for their Kids, those who have stayed home the last 3 elections, Blue Collar workers and women who want America safe again.
#altrightmeans trending on twitter, probably a Clinton plant but taken over by Trump supporters, It’s pretty good
#altrightmeans Trending on twitter ,taken over by Trump supporters, it’s pretty good