Posted on 08/30/2016 11:28:19 AM PDT by jazusamo
First Presidential “debate” is September 26
Snort, remind us how long she delayed answering FBI questions.
And when she doesn’t give the answers then what?
{crickets} or perhaps a sternly worded letter telling her to do so.
*BUMP*
I hope something comes of this!
Off the Wall Ping!
Contact to be added.
She’ll hand it off to her main “carpet”, Hum-mer, and then blame her if anything is found to be wrong.
Under oath? . . . that’s a laugh. Since when have the Clinton’s ever cared about oaths.
Bump!
I’m sorry, but I just can’t recall, despite having weeks to answer the questions....
Judicial watch is doing God’s work !
See tagline...
I agree. And they have an honest to goodness JUDGE saying that she HAS to answer these questions. Under oath.
If she doesn’t? Throw her fat @ss in a jail cell! :)
Question 1 through 25 . . .
Answer: I don’t remember
The Felon who is running for office will tell her attorneys to get a delay till after election day to submit her “answers.” She will probably get it.
For those of you who like to bash lawyers, I would point out that these questions were drafted by lawyers, and they are damned good and pointed questions.
Now, Clinton may not answer these written questions before the debate. That may not be a bad thin. What if Trump challenges her to answer them during a debate? If she answers, its her attorneys’ worst nightmare; unscripted and uncontrolled answers that she cannot back out of in answering formally answering the question. If she declines to answer the questions, it’s Huma’s worst nightmare (other than having to remove some soiled Depends, but that’s another issue); it’s Huma’s worst nightmare as campaign manager because refusing to answer the questions in a debate is a public confession of criminal behavior.
all this means is that her lawyers will write very lengthy non-responsive answers to each question, that admit nothing and say nothing.
“What if Trump challenges her to answer them during a debate?”
Herself will say that she cannot comment on an ongoing “review”.
“I refuse to answer the question on the grounds that it may incriminate me.”
“I’m hiding something.”
She takes that tack, and she might as well drink a cup of hemlock right there on stage. It’s political suicide.
Agree...Mrs. Bill Clinton nor Huma can be happy about this.
Although those are good questions, my guess only twenty five answers will be given versus the numerous supporting questions listed. I expect each individual question related to the individual initial questions will be ignored.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.