Posted on 09/19/2016 5:25:54 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
As of 09/18/2016...
Trump 47.8%
Clinton 41.1%
(Excerpt) Read more at cesrusc.org ...
50% on the horizon !
Big spread and holding. Gotta see this poll.
Trump breaks out above the error region....WHOOO...HOOO....DING ...DING
50 percent just happened saturday night and last night.
Got an emergency cell phone imminent danger alert about some piece of #### muslim (redundant) on the run in NYC.
call 911 if you see him.
AFTER I beat him bloody, i’d call 911.
I see Obama says we are polarized, racist, sexist, whatever other -ist they can gin up. But seriously, does anyone but losing Democrats care that Clinton is female, or any of that BS? Reflecting on the election to day, I see really no mention whatsoever about Clinton’s gender and when I do, it is raised by Clinton and her supporters. The rest of us could really care less. This, is something worth noting and celebrating in the election—we are going to elect or not elect Clinton on the merits. Nice.
EXCELLENT!!
50% within reach!
He’ll hit 50 or above after the first debate on the 26th. Maybe even before that, once people have time to react to several terrorist attacks over the weekend. Clinton looked like she was about ready to pass out when she was being asked about them.
Chris Stirewalt says FOX doesn’t include the LATimes poll because they poll the same 3000 people over & over again
Agreed, this poll is a seven day moving average so I think we can anticipate the margin to continue increase.
Terrorism used to help Republicans, but the media treats Obama as being good on terrorism. I hope the American people see Trump’s policies as being better than Obama’s and Hillary’s.
It looks like time for NBC to do a poll showing Hillary up 17 points and lil Natie Silver to say Trump has a 4% chance of winning.
Good results over a weekend. Republicans tend to not poll well on weekends since they are out doing stuff and not home to answer the phone.
Update: As of Monday September 19th, the Daybreak Poll’s charts will reflect a change in the way we compute the "area of uncertainty" represented by the gray band in each chart. This change means that candidate votes that are about 5 or 6 percentage points apart will be shown to be statistically significant (depending on sample size and how much variation there is in the voting). Our previous calculations required an interval of +/5.5 percentage points for significance in our election forecast, which we have determined was too conservative. We have adjusted the interval in the charts, and in the data provided in the poll’s csv files accordingly.
I think he’s incorrect. I think these guys have a pool of 3000, and they pick 400 every day.
Chris Stirewalt has limited brain function
Riiight. Like they wouldn’t include it if the result showed PIAPS / Baroness Harkkonen ahead...
The random bombs incite fear, but the aftermath of being inconvenienced by transportation basically being shut down in and out of the city incites anger. The interruption in productivity costs millions of $$$ and also takes an emotional toll, as you are experiencing.
Where is the threshold of tolerance for this nonsense? When are those who make excuses for it going to be held accountable? Who knows?
Aren’t these the same numbers from yesterday?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.