Posted on 09/25/2016 2:52:38 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000
They remember what happened to Candy Crowley.
“Candy Crowley fact-checked a statement live during a Romney-Obama town hall debate.”
Yea, and wasn’t she wrong???
The “moderator’s” job is to ask the question and monitor time...That’s it...PERIOD...
That, and in order not lose the rest of their not demented viewership, they'd have to fact check HRC, of whom it has been said that "she'd rather climb a tree to tell a lie than to stand where she is and tell the truth."
I'm sorry I missed that Forum. I guess I saw the other one.
Crowley didn’t “fact check” anything. She coordinated with Obama in presenting a plausible excuse for his ineptitude.
Trump is the Truth.
The only REAL fact checkers that matter are those of us who will be watching. Just about every statement by Shrillary will be a potential and even a probable lie.
Crowley didn’t fact check, she took sides.
Everyone knows there will be a debate transcript. Anyone with internet access can do all the fact-checking they want.
It is disingenuous of Clinton’s minions to demand a moderator/Inquisitor, but that’s how she rolls.
All we want for Donald Trump is a level playing field.
I think NBC will structure the questions given to Hillary to let her attack Trump and questions given to Trump will be structured to make him defend himself...
The LSM wouln’t recognize a fact if it came out of the toilet while they were peeing sitting down and bit them on the butt.
“Fact” has lost meaning. Leftists and “fact checkers” have made it mean “what I want to believe” rather than “what’s true”.
Fact checking sites are also liberally biased and Trump will call them out on that.
I think this is a pre-debate spin by Clinton. She will do the fact checking at the debate and doesn’t want to come across as the scolding hag that she is. She’s trying to soften the battlefield, but it won’t work. Her speaking voice and manner are too annoying.
We need less Holt.
I guess I’m old fashioned but I always thought a
debate argued a specific question.
Should England ensure Belgium’s neutrality?
What we have now is confrontational electioneering.
How on earth could we the People ever have permitted the existence of such a thing as a non-representative body of interested parties to control Presidential candidates in this way?
And the article failed to point out: Crowley got it wrong. It was a complete setup, and she fell for it.
Sharyl Atkinson published an article in the past week or so, where she detailed the Obama's administration to set up that strawman and press the media to knock it down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.