Russia warns against US attack on Syrian forces

Associated Presstitutes ^ | October 1, 2016 | BASSEM MROUE

[Navy Patriot]

Russia warned the United States Saturday against carrying out any attacks on Syrian government forces, saying it would have repercussions across the Middle East as government forces captured a hill on the edge of the northern city of Aleppo under the cover of airstrikes.

Meanwhile, airstrikes on Aleppo struck a hospital in the eastern rebel-held neighborhood of Sakhour on Saturday, putting it out of service, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees. They said at least one person was killed in the airstrike.

Russian news agencies quoted Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova as saying that a U.S. intervention against the Syrian army "will lead to terrible, tectonic consequences not only on the territory of this country but also in the region on the whole."

She said regime change in Syria would create a vacuum that would be "quickly filled" by "terrorists of all stripes."

[Navy Patriot]

Obama desperately striving to create "stability" to give ISIS Terrorists needed time to rearm, regroup and murder civilians.

[Diogenesis]

Why is the US helping al Qaeda and its ISIS spinoff?

[faithhopecharity]

because Obama is still in our White House and Congress is out to lunch

[rawcatslyentist]

Must be gonna hit the fan soon!

Our presstitutes are finally making it public knowledge.

[ConservativeMind]

Why are we defending ISIS and Al Queda?

[CivilWarBrewing]

Hmmmm let’s see, Russia or ISUS (Islamic State / U.S.).. Hmmmm...

[sport]

Because of the muslim in the White House and his disciples [[obama voters] decreed it.

[Iron Munro]

Why are we defending ISIS and Al Queda?

Here's your answer.

[Wpin]

I fear we live in very interesting times...where we will learn how little power governments have...

[Navy Patriot]

Why are we defending ISIS and Al Queda?

[BenLurkin]

War with Syria would require a declaration from Congress.

[Navy Patriot]

... ISUS (Islamic State / U.S.)...

Clever, may I steal that?

[Forward the Light Brigade]

all we need is Obama bumbling into a war with Russia!

[Alberta's Child]

I think there's more to it than that.

Obama has no interest in helping Sunni Muslims while at the same time he's been bending over backwards to accommodate the Shi'ites in Iran. Assad is supported by Iran.

I suspect the U.S. is waging this military campaign without any regard for what Obama wants to do. The @ssholes in Washington pushing to topple Assad are the same "neo-cons" from the Bush train wreck who are now supporting Hillary Clinton. This is a GOPe-Clinton deal, and this was probably why Clinton was orchestrating U.S. foreign policy through her Clinton Foundation computer network instead of the U.S. State Department.

[Navy Patriot]

War with Syria would require a declaration from Congress.

Get your sunscreen, honey, looks like Obama sidestepped Congress again...

[Wilderness Conservative]

When Russia says no pipeline they mean it.

[Sirius Lee]

Why is the US helping al Qaeda and its ISIS spinoff?

Because our president is the muzz slime manchurian candidate.

[VTenigma]

ROTFLOL, ATENTION! You have been “fundamentally transformed”.

[Navy Patriot]

The @ssholes in Washington pushing to topple Assad are the same "neo-cons" from the Bush train wreck who are now supporting Hillary Clinton. This is a GOPe-Clinton deal,...

While that statement is correct, these "@ssholes" would be nowhere near the Pentagon, military or any part of the US Government if they had not already been hand picked by Obama himself, don't fool yourself. Obama and the DemoRats for war have already assembled the Praetorian Military Command structure.

We will have war if and when Obama pulls the trigger.

[Navy Patriot]

When Russia says no pipeline they mean it.

Well, who would want a pipeline from the Gutter?