Posted on 10/11/2016 11:35:13 PM PDT by proust
After colluding with Chris Hayes at MSNBC, Chris Hayes conducted a rehearsed “interview” with Hillary Clinton as word for word with the Wikileaks email.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uj0P0sD22M
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274
Admin, I meant to post this in news, not chat. Please move if you feel it is newsworthy. thanks.
BFL
Why is this a bombshell? No one who hasn’t decided on this election is going to find any use for this report.
Give it a rest, troll.
We are all living in “The Truman Show”.
How about answering my question?
Since she is exempt from normal behavior standards, don’t think this means much... NO one cares except a few of us here.
Agreed, which is why I don’t think this is much of a bombshell. It would be better to isolate a couple of really critical points from these releases and beat Hillary and the MSM over the head with them. This jumping around makes it difficult for any of this to gain traction.
Are you a full-retard? Did you ride the short-bus to school? Either it is an interview or an infomercial. I cannot believe that Freeper would not know the goddamn difference.
Please decent yourself.
This is not the 1970’s, this is 2016 if the MSM is not covering it then get out and spread the word on the internet..
Yes, there is too much out at once—information overload. I even heard Fox earlier today dismissing it all, explaining that Obama has officially blamed Russia for the hacking and that there is reportedly fake data thrown in the mix. Thus, all is suspect and should be ignored. If the media take the bait, this could make it even harder to get everyone to pay attention to the details, to any of it. Imagine if the public decides to ignore everything and trust the media and Obama?
Shocking /s
This is going viral. Lots of undecided eyeballs are going to see this phony bitch
What is an “interview” anymore? There are few true journalists left. Now, most are commentators delivering modern day yellow journalism. None admit conflicts of interest and no one holds them to any ethical standards. No law nor enforcement say they cannot propagandize for their candidate. The media organizations don’t seem to care and likely actually sanction this.
Lots more people read facebook, Reddit, and Twitter than the MSM anymore. Stuff like this goes viral.
At some point, given all we know, you either think she is a corrupt and nasty person or you simply don’t care.
We knew all of this - the emails simply confirm what we already knew. The average person does not pay as much attention to news as we do and they are likely becoming numb to this constant barrage. There has been enough to make up their minds.
Just my .02. With that said, I have found some of this stuff very interesting and if they have more (they say they do) they are probably getting upset at the new media characterization of it all.
It is now fair game to ask everyone in the media whether or not they ever colluded with Hillary.
the daybreak poll tonight is pretty rough. Surprised after the debate. But we knew it would a tough election and we can win this thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.