Posted on 10/13/2016 6:27:35 AM PDT by Columbo
Is that an email to and from someone or an opinion piece?
I’m truly astonished that the Clinton campaign didn’t vigorously disavow the use of Trump’s leaked tax returns or even the leaked video from last week. They must have known what sort of dirt was coming on Hillary. If they had claimed that using leaked documents from unreliable sources was beneath the dignity of an American presidential campaign they could have some leg to stand on now.
As it stands how can they possibly claim that the Wikileaks material shouldn’t be referenced? You don’t get much more illegal or illegitimate than leaking and publishing someone’s tax returns without permission.
Never mind. The LSM will completely ignore all the dirt on HIllary. But my local news just spent 3 minutes on the new allegations from multiple accusers against Trump. Oh wait, they are covering Trump’s misbehavior again now.....only 25 minutes after they covered it....so every half hour. My question is: if these allegations are true, why didn’t the women complain before.....when they could’ve maybe gotten settlements from the deep pocket organizations for whom Trump worked. Oops, now they are touting Chelsea coming to Phoenix for a campaign event. If Trump can actually pull out a victory, the LSM will be devastated.
They all sound like teenagers.
I agree. Can someone post the entire email, so we don’t have to dig for it?
Wikileeks make Bernstein and Woodward look like amateurs.
It’s an email from Brent Budowsky to John Podesta.
Which one is it? There are so many of them, I’d like to read the original.
Libtards, brats....
Thanks
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7432
I would just post the whole thing but the formatting is giving me trouble.
Probably the best way to keep up with today's new dump from Wikileaks.
> They must have known what sort of dirt was coming on Hillary
They don’t care
1. She’s above the law
2. Her supporters don’t care about anything she did/does
3. The focus is on getting a few % of undecideds to think that Trump is dangerous/sleazy/embarrassing
For the last one they just need the media to cover Trump leaks and defend her so those undecideds don’t realize she is dangerous/sleazy/embarrassing. So they are all for any leaks as long as they control the media.
“Neera Tanden is a political activist, domestic policy adviser and the President of Center for American Progress, a progressive public policy research and advocacy organization in Washington, DC.” (Wikipedia)
Again, what comes across is that the smartest people in the world are morons.
This is going to come across as arrogant, but I have to tell you ... one of the things that always astonished me as I got older was just how mediocre I found so many people in positions of power and authority to be. This includes people in government AND people in the corporate world.
What comes across to me is that "the smartest people in the room" are the ones who are easily bought.
A lot of folks here aren't big fans of Chris Christie, but this quote of his ought to go down as one of the greatest political quotes of all time. He said this a couple of years ago in response to a question about whether he'd be interested in running for the U.S. Senate after his term as governor in New Jersey ended:
"Can you imagine me banging around that chamber with 99 other people? Asking for a motion on the amendment in the subcommittee? Forget it. It would be over, everybody. You’d watch me just walk out and walk right into the Potomac River and drown."
LMAO.
Libtards are all emotionally arrested at age 14.
You can tell when you go to their blogs and they can’t express any thought without dropping the “F” bomb three
times per paragraph.
Sid is lost in his own web of conspiracies. I pay zero attention to what he says.
On Friday, January 1, 2016, Brent Budowsky wrote:
> John, assume I wrote a thousand words about this. It is disquieting that
> when HRC was secretary of state she spent a good time of time doing gossip
> emails with Sid Blumenthal about various matters, the ubiquitous Lanny
> Davis shilling for himself in pathetic ways, and Neera Tanden gossiping
> about what Soros thinks of Obama. At least Tanden I regard as a serious
> person. Sid and Lanny I do not by standards of a secretary of state or
> potential president.
>
> I was not in touch with you at the time of the healthcare debate, but what
> Sid suggests does not strike me as your style. I was in very regular and
> close touch with Daschle at the time, and he would never have said to the
> press what Sid suggests, and since I am in the press I know those were not
> his views. I guarantee that based on direct personal knowledge of Tom's
> views and actions at the time. Blumenthal did not have the slightest idea
> of what he was talking about in his girlie gossip with the secretary of
> state about this. Why she places such great stock over so much time in
> these exchanges with Blumenthal is mystifying to me---and frankly
> troublesome.
>
> This whole subject, to use vernacular, gives me the creeps. Secretaries
> of state, presidential candidates and presidents should not be spending
> their time on this kind of minor league stuff.
>
> Sent from my iPad
4. They will try to blame it on the Russians, and say that the Russians are trying to control our elections.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.