Posted on 10/14/2016 4:11:25 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Developing story The New York Times dropped their explosive accusation story about a first-class airline passenger named Jessica Leeds who claimed Donald Trump groped her 30 years ago. The two New York Times reporters for the accusation, Michael Barbaro and Megan Twohey, have a history of questionable reporting about Donald Trump.
Research discovers two additional Donald Trump connected stories with the exact name Jessica Leeds attached, and -adjusted for chronology- the same age as the NYT report.
*snip*
♦ The second story containing Jessica Leeds, is related to the same Rancho Palos Verdes golf course and a fence dispute between the Trump property and Jessica Leeds personally. The second story is in the LA Times dated October 30th, 2008.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
In the meantime ...
Michelle O’s big fat gift to TRUMP
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3480415/posts
Michelle said to ‘women’: “Rise up againt Trump!”
1. Her husband already did ‘rise up’, ‘flaunting’ a notable member to a group of flight attendants. [*a*]
2. Tag-team that with tax funded viagra for perverts and rapists [*b*], and here goes.
~~~
President Obama’s salute of women [caught on video] ... [snip]
YES BTT
I’m glad I checked downthread before posting that exact graphic.
But what even is the basis to that claim? Yes, these are the same writers who wrote the earlier bogus story on Trump and women, and both these women’s claims stink to high heaven, as they say.
But this is not the CA Jessica Leads, and I see no evidence of the Times dropping the story. Here she is in two prominent Times stories from today:
I think you may be taking the term “dropped the story” in the wrong context. Think of it as “dropped a bombshell” and it makes more sense. I did a double take too, but thought about it a little and it makes sense if you look at it in a different context.
Another thread here on FR implies both women are also Clinton supporters and donors. Is it true? Not sure but I’d believe it, that’s the way the Clintons do things.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3480435/posts
Well if that’s all that was meant there is even less reason to keep this bogus story up—since that’s not news at this point at all.
Good point...kinda...this is another aspect of the story though. As we go, and the fact checkers do their thing, details start leaking out...
One other thing I’m wondering about. I think this was in a FR post.
Not sure if it is true, but one claimed Trump groped her om a commercial flight, and he had already bought his own plane, so why would he fly commercial? True or not? I don’t know. But worth considering.
All in all it’s really starting to look like a really bogus report, and we haven’t even seen what evidence Trump has yet.
Women who already have a grudge against Trump, both Clinton donors, all of it just happens to pop up at the same time, right after the “locker room talk” tape, and right around the time of both the debate and Wikileaks story...way too much coincidence for me.
I expected stuff like this to come out right around the end of the election...
“Michelle said to women: Rise up against Trump!
And her husband did just like he was Carlos Danger Jr.!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.