I believe it.
The woman probably has a personality like Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction. Such people have a very distorted view of reality.
Will the media give it any air time?
Once one of these stories is debunked the rest are all discounted. This hits the NY Times.
“I have only met this accuser once and frankly cannot imagine why she is seeking to make out that Trump made sexual advances on her. Not only did he not do so (and I was present at all times) but it was she that was the one being flirtatious,” Anthony Gilberthorpe said in a note provided to The Post by the Trump campaign.You know, I had a blinding flash of what now seems to me to be obvious. I solicit the opinion of female type FReeper girls on this comparison:
- The obvious intent of the now-infamous “locker room talk” by Trump was to boast of his attractiveness to women, a put-down to the rest of mortal man who can only dream of having women manifest excitement to be in our presence.
- I have read that beauty pageants are actually for women, and that the Miss America pageant is actually a super bowl for women - on women’s competitive battleground, feminine attractiveness.
- Taking that to be true, we have “octopus girl” “complaining” that a billionaire businessman could not resist her beauty and threw propriety to the winds in public in daylight, physically expressing lust for her for 15 minutes. Begging the obvious question as to why she waited 15 minutes - never mind decades - to go public, the clear implication seems that her “complaint” is actually a boast.
How far off base am I?
Krauthamer said a few minutes ago this remark by Trump means he would have never assaulted this woman because of her looks. Thats not the way I took it all. Krauthammer has always despised Trump.
“And by the way, the area was a public area, people all over the place,” he added. “Take a look, you take a look. Look at her, look at her words, you tell me what you think. I don’t think so.”
http://www.wgal.com/politics/trump-on-accuser-take-a-look-at-her-i-dont-think-so/42094304
I find this more believable than Leeds
She was wearing a pant suit?
I don’t know about anyone else, but this election I am very much voting AGAINST THE MEDIA as much as I am voting against the female boss of the DBMSM propaganda machine. NO Trump was not my fav but he gets my vote for TAKING ON THE MEDIA which no republican has ever had the gonads to do.
this guy looks like bad news
The story was splashed across the Sunday Mirror the next day. Anthony Gilberthorpe had set the whole thing up, ensuring that I was up in York in his flat with Anna, that the room was covered in CCTV and wired for sound. I’d known him for years, he’d been a friend of the family, but he was paid about £25,000.
https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2003/nov/16/features.magazine57
All the phony dirt they’re digging up on Trump is reminiscent of Nixon’s “dirty tricksters’ back in 1972, the Committee to re-elect the President (CREEP). The dems have become that which they despised. The difference being, back in Nixon’s time there was no social media to speak of, the only emails were messages transmitted between two primitive, (by today’s standards) computers at MIT and UCLA. But that was then, this is now.