Posted on 10/22/2016 8:01:19 AM PDT by cotton1706
No more appointments. No more ambassadorships. No more trade "deals. No more government contracts. Muffie may have to get a "job" in the private sector rather than volunteering at Planned Barrenhood.
See the preceding back and forth with the aptly named arrogant sob. You will have fun fencing with that one.
All in due time, grasshopper. You do understand that, should Trump become president the battle between Good and Evil will be joined in earnest. As when rebuilding a football team you can’t change everything at once and sometimes must stick with players you don’t really want.
There is likely to be three seats which need appointments next term, there will be no dying by attrition. Nor is there a foolproof way of telling how a justice will vote on any issue. See Reagan’s appointees for example. Only one Clarence Thomas has proven to be a towering presence.
As you your self has noted the Republican Party will never be the same after Trump. It is also instructive that you have to go back fifty years to find a Democrat superior to a Republican. That was a time when there were actually Democrats who were patriots and believed in a traditional view of the world. TODAY, there are NO Democrats superior to even the most weak-kneed Republican.
I have not been posting until recently because I was deathly ill, fortunately God has spared me so I can once again spread sweetness and light.
IF and ONLY IF, ALL of the following conditions prevail on November 8, will I even CONSIDER voting for the baby-killing, gun grabbing, "gay" enabingPOS Nancyboy. No less than Little Dick Durbin (with whom he has a natural mutual admiration society as the D and "R" wings of IL Uniparty treasonweasels): 1. The majority of the Senate ("Rs" and outright social issue revolutionary slaves of the Chamber of Commerce "interests" and, maybe 3 others worth voting for, is seriously in question in my sole judgment;
2. I am convinced that Mitch the Bitch McConnell, John Cornyn, and the rest of the usual gang of soulless commerce servants are, in fact not just in rhetoric, not just in usually worthless promises, going to stop ANY Demonrat nominee to SCOTUS, support Trump's nominees WITHOUT RESERVATION, EVEN IF it offends Lindsay Light loafers or Robert Portman or his faggot Yalie son or or Libertoonian Flake or John Queeg McCain who might feel free to vote baby-killer since 2016 is the last time that old treasonweasel can possibly be nominated. This condition require a retention of at least the current treshhold of 60 to end a filibuster and bring a SCOTUS nomination to the floor. If the GOP has a majority and the Hildebeast is POTUS, it would make sense to restore the 60 vote threshhold for ALL federal judicial nominees and other POTUS nominees as well.
3. I am personally convinced that, in spite of his despicable life, track record in office, support for baby-killing and gun grabbing and sexually perverted everything among MANY other less notable issues, Nancyboy is nonetheless "electable" because of the airheadedness and general stupidity of IL voters, with a ton of vote fraud as a side dish. After all, Tammy Quack Quack is absolutely no better. Her only advantage is that she does not posture as though she were something she is not (which is Nancyboy's stock in trade. Since, as a senator, she will simply vote as Schmuckie Chewmer tells her to vote, if all conditions are met, I can live without the likes of Quack Quack.
The ideas that you and other GOP-E express are a very good shorthand for why conservatives who ARE CONSERVATIVES are homicidally enraged by the whores running both parties and their insatiable raging hunger for payoffs which cancels any willingness to satisfy the public. Losing is the one thing they seem to understand.
Reagan appointed Antonin Scalia. He was talked into nominating Sandra Day O'Connor by lies told to him in a memorandum by none other than Ken Starr instigated by James Baker. It was claimed in that memo which I have seen and read that O'Connor was the "pro-life leader" in the Arizona state senate when, in fact she was the Goldwaterite Planned Barrenhood mouthpiece in the Arizona State Senate and a rampaging pro-abort. Just another GOP-E liar. I know the people who vetted her and she vowed to be pro-life. She was nominated as a somewhat pretty aging blonde who would give Reagan the "distinction" of naming the first woman to the SCOTUS. Bonuses were that her married name was O'Connor which would assure that Catholics would think her pro-life but she is a Unitarian AND she was a reliable social revolutionary who would violate her promises and become the new Herod Blackmun. Try and win elections without unified pro-life support. Good luck!
Sorry to hear of your illness. I spent seventeen days at death's door in coma from kidney failure and a total of twenty-four days in coma between Thanksgiving and Christmas of 2014. In whatever time God may grant me, I will defend His babies even and maybe especially from barbarian office holders posing as GOP.
Just a thought: God may have spared you so that you will have the opportunity to amend your life before rendering an accounting to Him.
There have been very few votes that I have cast which I felt enthusiastic about. But I understand that the county does not think as I do so have to pick and choose among the undesirables.
My support for Trump was immediate and unshakeable and it is clear that he represents the only chance to stop political correct ideology rampant in both parties and will FIGHT. Neither will be the same after this election. He is not a conservative (whatever that obsolete term even means) but he is a fighter. That is all I can hope for given the media control of the American mind.
I agree with your second paragraph although it took me longer to accept Trump. However, “Conservative” will NEVER be obsolete. It is shorthand for everything that makes Western Civilization a worthy cause and way of life.
Conservative to me means traditionalist. We are agents of change not “conservatives”. The Founders were not conservatives, they were against the Monarchy and for the Republic. These terms are obsolete in modern usage.
What is called “conservative” today is actually Classical Liberalism. Concern for Liberty. What is currently “liberal” today is actually a soft fascism, anti-liberty and pro government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.