Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts: Video evidence isn't slam dunk in police shootings
Associated Press ^ | Nov 17, 2016 6:58 PM EST | Amy Forliti

Posted on 11/17/2016 9:52:35 PM PST by Olog-hai

When Philando Castile was shot by a Minnesota police officer, his girlfriend broadcast his final moments live on Facebook. But experts say the footage from a squad car camera was probably a bigger factor in prosecutors’ decision to charge the officer with manslaughter.

And that footage, which has not been made public, is still no guarantee that Jeronimo Yanez will be convicted, as other police shootings have shown.

“There have been cases that had video that resulted in either an acquittal or a hung jury, so sometimes the video may raise more questions,” said Philip Stinson, a criminologist at Bowling Green State University who tracks fatal police shootings. “It’s very hard to convict in these cases.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: blackliesmurder; bluelivesmatter; philandocastile; phonevideo

1 posted on 11/17/2016 9:52:35 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There was something wrong with this story since it was first reported. Let’s see the dash cam video.


2 posted on 11/17/2016 10:17:32 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
“There have been cases that had video that resulted in either an acquittal or a hung jury, so sometimes the video may raise more questions,” said Philip Stinson, a criminologist at Bowling Green State University who tracks fatal police shootings. “It’s very hard to convict in these cases.”

Same can be said of eyewitnesses. Is this numnuts saying additional objective evidence is bad?

WTH do they get these 'experts'?

3 posted on 11/17/2016 10:45:00 PM PST by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The cop won’t be convicted. Cops aren’t convicted, ever. The evidence doesn’t matter, people are wasting their time with that. Just wait and see.


4 posted on 11/17/2016 10:57:06 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Finally an unbiased report on a police involved shooting.

Do I really need to put a sarc on it?


5 posted on 11/18/2016 4:19:22 AM PST by fella ("As this was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

But it IS evidence. Right?


6 posted on 11/18/2016 4:28:40 AM PST by themidnightskulker (And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Lisr! Liar! Pants on fire.

They do get convicted even when they are innocent. Read the news.


7 posted on 11/18/2016 7:39:34 AM PST by Tarasaramozart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tarasaramozart
Lisr! Liar! Pants on fire. They do get convicted even when they are innocent. Read the news.

Yeah I do read the news. What are you, in third grade? Stay out of adult issues.

8 posted on 11/18/2016 10:43:39 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson